Microsoft wants to move Windows fully to the cloud
theverge.com
theverge.com
I see the value proposition, but it’s only as fast (and expensive) as your internet speed.
- Businesses and consumers could buy less expensive hardware, and simply pay $x/month for access.
- IT could remotely troubleshoot - Fewer hardware issues
- A $10/month subscription would last longer than a $1200 laptop for most consumers.
- MS handles all software updates, stores all your personal data, has complete control of hardware and software.
- Some sort of device is still required, how does it respond to input from a keyboard, mouse, controller, etc? How do USBs, Raspberry Pi’s, External storage devices work?
- You still need a screen. I could see this being an app on smart TVs and mobile devices. (The form-factor of a powerful PC is smaller because of the streaming aspect)
- Internet is still relatively slow, every input would feel laggy and unresponsive.
- Anyone can guess your username/pwd and gain access to your PC.
- Hackers now have a single target.
- If Microsoft’s servers ever go down, you can’t use your PC at all.
- You are subject to any future government regulations with no choice to opt out.
- You lose access to everything if your subscription expires.
- MS has an unprecedented level of access to data that will inevitably be used for advertising.
- MS becomes your ISP and can filter traffic however they want.
It's pretty clear that the revenue for Microsoft will be coming from Cloud + ads. Accelerating that makes total business sense.
Computing as a service rather than a personally owned device. I wonder if at some point they will just lend the hardware as an access point to complete the vision of a no longer personally owned device/software.