Someone honestly trying to refute my comment in good faith could have looked around and easily understood this.
They would then have found another comment [1], mentioning a pull request [2] supposedly fixing this exact issue, with the explicit aim to fix "performance issues".
If that was not a bug, then I don’t know what is.
But then, I understand that this can be a lot to ask.
Personally, I believe the only valid criticism that could stand here would be that, not having bothered to check if it still was an issue, I perhaps should have instead used the past tense, out of precaution, instead of assuming the bug had been fixed two to three years after being initially reported. And I shall try to remember that.
So thank you, I guess.
[0]: https://github.com/typeorm/typeorm/issues/4499
[1]: https://github.com/typeorm/typeorm/issues/4499#issuecomment-...