Hacker News Reader

> He's also doing this thing we need a name for, something like "fallacious pithiness".

We have a word for this, it's "tweeting".

> We have a word for this, it's "tweeting".

Ok, then you should know that your response was also tweeting, given that definition.

I think it was humour, but the issue is that it's easy to conflate.

It was a second order observation, so doesn't need to also include itself.

It was the same kind of silly pseudo-pithiness, though.

Perhaps, but in this case it was also true.

haha exactly