And you travel from city center to city center, rather than middle-of-nowheres named after a city.
>And you travel from city center to city center, rather than middle-of-nowheres named after a city.
When you land you can rent a car... when you arrive on a train you are forced to either pay for a taxi or take pub... pu... public transportation
Also it's not always much faster. Italy's high speed network eventually won with their national airline. And no wonder - a trip going halfway across the peninsula takes roughly as much time, but is generally more pleasant.
Do you think the Barcelona metro is only for plebs who are below you in the pecking order?
In a lot of ways, I understand why Deutsche Bahn sucks, a lot of politics ruined the company.
i missed a connection because a plane was late by half an hour. (it departed an hour late but caught up some time). the connecting flight was by the same airline. we absolutely could have made the connection, but the airline decided to reroute us anyways which added 6 hours and an additional transfer to our trip which meant that i was awake for 48 hours by the time we finally reached our accomodation and i got sick and had to rest some days from the exhaustion.
i absolutely would have preferred a multi-day train trip over that experience.
what doesn't work is, if you have a regional pass, and you buy a ticket from outside that region, but you are late for the first leg of that ticket, then your ticket may no longer be valid. it would be the same for flights.
Germany it used to also be like that until around a decade ago.
I definitely remember time lost in Reisezentrum arguing for new tickets and how I wasn't to blame for an ICE to be parked 1h outside Frankfurt.
I travel by train in Europe since late 1980's, while interesting alternative, let's not forget the not so nice parts.
https://europa.eu/youreurope/citizens/travel/passenger-right...
Especially since the cheaper plane flights in Europe are absolutely painful, dropping you off 2 hours away from the city centre into some minor airport.
Taking the TGV from Paris to Zuerich in comparison is such a relief.
- the occupancy of the trip
- the distance
- the number of stops
- the form of “last mile” transportation required
- the age and model of the vehicle
- the specific fuel source
I mean, I believe the statistic is true in aggregate. It’s like saying “vegan food has lower carbon emissions” which is true in aggregate. But wild game is often astronomically lower emissions (not to mention lower cruelty) than typical vegan food.
So these aggregate statistics are interesting points to ponder, but we don’t live in aggregate. We eat specific foods and we travel specific routes.
And at the individual level these statistics become... well not “mostly false” but certainly “frequently false”.
To me, the base statistic is a great starting point but the next questions we need to ask is: when are flights lower emission? When is hunting more humane? Etc. That’s how we can really drive better individual decisions. “Just ride the train and eat vegan” won’t get us to a globally sufficient decision framework.
Contrary to airport connections, if one looses it, it is lost. There aren't last calls, or help to get another one. Unless one has bought the more expensive ticket with flexible trains.
If you don't have a car you choose where to live based on this, when I used to commute I always lived never more than 7 minutes walk from a station.
What are you, European?
/s
https://www.cnn.com/travel/article/china-high-speed-rail-cmd...