Was everyone this skeptical / glib when the (insert technology) was useless when it was invented? Anyone seen the efficiency of a solar panel in 1970?
Factory farming is a real problem to solve.
Was everyone this skeptical / glib when the (insert technology) was useless when it was invented? Anyone seen the efficiency of a solar panel in 1970?
Factory farming is a real problem to solve.
Good thing someone took one for the team and invested in scaling this up.
It was an exports/services (consulting) play. "Skating where the puck will be" and all that—become the experts with plenty of production capacity before the market per se justifies it. IIRC they made similar efforts for other renewables, like wind power. Not sure how all that's going, but I know it was regarded by many as a good move, a couple decades back when they were investing in it all.
I would be surprised if some HN topic does not provoke any skepticism at all.
It's similar in vein to the people who were absolutely convinced that Biden was preparing a team to confiscate gas stoves and responded by.... running their gas stoves on full burn for no reason, as a "protest".
I have no moral qualms with raising, killing, and eating an animal. If lab grown meat is tasty, safe, and affordable, it will be great.
If solar panels are a solution to replace fossil fuels, then show me a decrease in fossil fuels (nope, solar panel adoption and fossil fuel burn are positively correlated). If factory farms are a solution for providing reducing the impact of traditional farms, then show me a decrease in the total ecological footprint of our agricultural system (nope, we can't even do so on a small scale per this study and others like it). What you call "skepticism", I call critical thinking about empirical data.
You've misread their comment:
> Factory farming is a real problem to solve.