Hacker News Reader

These tools are enabled by the owner of the repository. And I think consent has precedence over license terms. But this seems like an escape hatch for using your code as a training material.

If it doesn't explicitly say: we do not use private repos data to train our AI models, I wouldn't even consider assuming any other way than that's exactly what they are doing. They know this is a question everyone wants to know the answer to. Why would they leave any ambiguity? Let me help you answer that: because that's exactly what they are doing.

Also dependency graph is enabled by default. So there's that.

This. I believe the title of this post is a click bait, and doesn’t include the context of this verbiage.

Use of data for AI training is a big deal. Implicitly allowing it under this definition will be enough cause for a lawsuit.

> in reality there is a legal framework and a ToS in place as well.

That doesn't give a lot of comfort. ToS can change at any time.