> RHEL 1:1 bug compatibility.
Did they actually offer this, because CentOS never offered this.
Did they actually offer this, because CentOS never offered this.
If the software I write behaves on my workstation but then malfunctions on my target device because a bug was only fixed in Rocky Linux, that would be very annoying.
I want stuff to run the exact same way on both so that I can develop workarounds if needed before even deploying to the targets.
CentOS stated: https://www.spinics.net/lists/centos-devel/msg19564.html
> We came up with the phrase "bug-for-bug" compatible during EL5 as a GOAL to aim for. CentOS was NEVER bug-for-bug compatible.
Rocky may have changed that line, but I would be surprised. CentOS was always "good enough".
What does Rocky provide you in this situation?
How much does something like this cost a developer as part of an org?
https://developers.redhat.com/articles/faqs-no-cost-red-hat-...