Nah. Gimp maybe isn't exactly as good as Photoshop (even though some tools were in Gimp much earlier than in Photoshop) but there is a huge difference between this website and Gimp. I appreciate the effort, but the functionalities of this website are way far from being anywhere near Gimp.

Why can't we just say "a generic image editor"? It's not really a faithful clone of anything in particular.