Maybe I missed some other information?
All I see here is the: if you really think you're not violating the law, present that in your jurisdiction.
Facebook is in so many countries that they aren't going to spend millions on lawyers to back up their policies. So they do the most conservative analysis possible and let the advertisers do the rest.
I can't imagine any other way if you want to reduce liability.
Wild _crazy_ idea — it's really out there, but hear me out: You do as much business as you can do properly; support et al.
Like some other commenters mentioned, this is actually helpful for affected people/businesses because they might not know that they have legal recourse against Meta's decision. But still sad that they are not able to handle the whole appeals process better.
(1) A trader who maintains a website or uses terms and conditions shall, […]
1. […] inform consumers of the extent to which it is willing or obliged to take part in dispute resolution procedures before a consumer conciliation body […]
I imagine there is equivalent legislation for B2B, this one applies to consumer matters.
Or maybe the notice is a catch-all for exactly this law.
DE: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/vsbg/BJNR025410016.html#B... EN: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_vsbg/englisch_vs...