I only use Google Maps for discovery and reviews. The navigation experience is not very good.
I only use Google Maps for discovery and reviews. The navigation experience is not very good.
Apple used to get some things boneheadedly wrong and it's hard to go back to an App that's done that but it has gotten really good, and the UX has been vastly better than the Google products for a long time. Much more legible at dashboard distance, much more clear, not showing popup POI locations based on advertising that you aren't interested in, voice directions are much better, etc..
It feels like both Waze and Google Maps have stood still for the last 10 years, at least if you're using them on the iPhone.
I've never experienced that.... That would be insane...
A quick search confirms that they do exist so I wonder if they're not rolled out, or potential non legal, in Europe.
"Turn right at McDonald's" and such.
(It's possible that that's not an ad, just something they thought was a convenient feature, but it sure sounds like the thing that they'd figure out a way to monetize even if it didn't start that way.)
Anyway, my family doesn't care for them. No thanks for another machine sticking brand names into our lives. Hopefully Apple doesn't adopt the same feature.
Especially since - and this is the part that makes it feel most like an ad - it's really seems only to be for certain big brands. "Street name, street name, street name, WENDY'S, street name..."
I love Naomi Klein and all, but sometimes looking for small side street sign while everyone's going at least 45mph on a stroad is nearly impossible.
I actually find it super useful. I remember the first time it happened to me, because I was surprised but also super pleased.
I was driving and it said "turn into the driveway after the Good Earth sign". And sure enough, I would have totally missed the nearly hidden driveway right past the Good Earth, but the sign on the restaurant was so big it was impossible to miss, even on the 45mph stroad I was on.
I also find it a much less useful way of indicating directions, but I recognize that's just because my brain works differently. That's not a criticism of doing it that way.
Besides, she wouldn't have done that. She would have been more likely to give me directions in a way that is more useful to me than that, because she knows me.
Apple Maps also rarely tells you to make unprotected left turns against traffic, whereas Waze will happily give you nearly impossible but theoretically faster directions.
If it wasn't for me being slightly familiar with the route and advising my wife to ignore it that's what would have happened.
I've had similar problems, again mostly with lane guidance on exiting/splitting motorways, in Kent as well so I won't touch it with a barge pole now... I can't recall Waze ever letting me down
It will put me through some ridiculous routes or lead me to incorrect destination for the same place I've been visiting for many years.
I get the feeling that I'm being used as a Guinea pig.
When I went to Venice, Apple map generally worked better in terms of walking directions.
As well, it insists on naming my cities main streets by their highway #s rather than the actual names of the street - which is extra confusing because the two directions of the "highway" are the two one-way main streets through town.
I agree - I've long suspected that I've been used as a "probe" to check if a road is still accessible, or what speed is typical, etc. by being sent on strange sub-optimal routes.
If I know the orientation of the map, then I can usually figure out what my starting direction is. Otherwise, I stuck with Google Maps fumbling direction until I start moving my vehicle, and by that point, it's already mis-navigated me.
I also hate the way their maps are constantly hiding information, like street names, unless you zoom waaaaaay in.
MapQuest provided so much detail at similar scales vs. Google Maps.
I understand that feeling completely. I travel all over the US and rely upon it. Google Maps is my only copilot and it can give some really puzzling suggestions.
My last fun one: I was traveling on an interstate and had ~5 miles to go until my exit onto a highway (which I was then going to travel on for ~50 miles.) Instead of continuing down the interstate, it had me exit at the nearest exit, then get onto a rutted out dirt road (which would have connected with the highway.) All to save a mile I guess? I quickly turned around when I realized where Maps had lead me.
One other time I was leaving a residential neighborhood and it literally had me driving in a loop around the block until I restarted the navigation.
It's pretty much a requirement to look at where Google Maps is actually going to take you before setting off, and that's unfortunate.
I can understand the perspective of not counting non-public roads. The ag access was clearly marked as a road for ag/forestry but it was still a road that had a direct access to the roundabout. On the other hand, the driveway was not marked in any way though you could sort of tell it was a driveway.
But when you are driving, you are not necessarily evaluating whether this roundabout exit is one you can use or one you should or shouldn't count.
It was interesting to me that the Apple nav was harder to follow in those cases than the car nav. Before these incidents happened, I am not sure I could have guessed at which would be better.
"Don't drive on other people's private driveways so don't include private roads" is a reasonable heuristic to follow. But "count every road whether or not you might use it" is also reasonable.
Like Maps is fine but it's like using an off-brand google maps from 10 years ago with a pretty display. Unfortunately I don't really care how pretty the display is, I care about being able to find things and get there.
That’s the case for most Apple apps, and some non Apple apps too
It was quite good both times I was within the coverage area, and I was guessing it might roll out much more widely as a feature of their VR headset (since the data is more 3D than street view's), but no.
There's a big list of places where they're mapping this year [3] but who knows when that data will make it to the actual service.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Look_Around_(Apple)#/media/Fil...
[2] https://www.apple.com/ios/feature-availability/#maps-look-ar...
They've got 4 cities done in California, which leaves 15 for the other 49 states.
I'm in Knoxville which isn't covered, only Nashville here with Memphis presumably next in line. We're the 131st largest city in the US with about 200k people, similar to Salt Lake City or Columbus. Could be a long time before they get the rest of us.
It means my phone can stay in my pocket and I can still get directions to where I am going without needing to look down at the screen to figure out that I need to pass this next traffic light then turn right at "Something st" when I can't even see the sign for "Something st" and looking for that sign would take my focus off the road/other drivers.
This was in 2019 and I was using google as my default application, and I was blown away how much better Apple handled the trains. The part I remember most was how it denoted each train with proper colors, while showing their live positions. That made it easy to navigate the otherwise intimidating quantity of trains and complexity of the stations.
The experience got me to try Apple Maps in the USA again, where I found the quality had substantially improved and good enough for my use cases. It's only improved since then.
Though I haven't used Google Maps there in a while, maybe they stopped using Jorudan.
In the US, I use Google Maps / Waze / Apple Maps about 50/20/30% of the time (Google by default / Waze if I care about shaving minutes or police / Apple if I am using Siri or just going somewhere I know and the Map is easily shown)
Apple Maps doesn't even offer (maybe it does on iOS?) public transport directions at all.
It's good, but I find it offputtingly cartoonish.