99% of human written children books are terrible. I doubt ChatGPT is worse.
the thing is, we need the other 1%, but when in absolute numbers it is small, you can still kind of find it, but imagine you have to look through 1 billion books to find one good book, it is as good as this 1% disappearing
> So books, from Blood Meridian to Hop on Pop, are in part a dialogue between writer and reader. But the machines generating these stories cannot participate in a dialogue. They’re Mechanical Turks, guessing what word comes next based on a mix of complex math and the labor of Kenyan contractors paid less than $2 an hour to make sure the responses aren’t too racist.
You cannot simply ask an AI to generate a story that carries any sort of meaning.
First, AI stories don't have to be one prompt wonders where it does everything. It can be an iterative, or curated, process guided by a person. Second, AI is perfectly capable of putting together words that carry meaning. What magic sauce do your collection of words have that an AI wouldn't? They can quite possibly be the same exact words.
Wait until the children's books become the next battle ground for misinformation/agitprop. You could sneak stuff into images too I suppose.
Many people fail to grasp the importance of single order of magnitude changes, we are about to witness multiple orders across multiple industries.
Incoming wild ride.