The middle road option if they want to delay KYC checks would be to have customer support available to unstuck people when the system fails.
To spy on them and report them for non-crimes, and to deny them services because the specific numbers are above arbitrary thresholds, at arbitrary thresholds, and yes... even below those.
If you're already empowered by the feds to do all these things, what's a little dishonesty on top of all that? As long as you don't fuck over the feds themselves, they'll surely look the other way when bilk free advertising dollars out of those probably-terrorists.
This pattern of facts doesn't look like a terrorism prevention system, it looks like theft, you would have a good case in any court with this pattern of facts.
This is a huge problem with most tech companies. There is little to no human support which ends up with a complete loss of access to accounts and, sometimes, funds. Because the accounts are usually free or funds lost are way too tiny to warrant a suit, there is little to no accountability.
>Make a software platform everyone just agrees to click through EULA's for >Someone realizes, wait, this is a contract. I'm supposed to be able to negotiate. >Nigh impossible to get in contact with legal. >If you do, they just ignore you. >Get more people to do it. >Business goes under rather than actually try to exist in a world where everyone doesn't just mindlessly accept terms. Or >To many small claims court cases, National Court system encourages private arbitration >Still too expensive.
To be quite frank, and though I'm loathe to make encourage people to send business at lawyers... We live in a world that is entirely the result of our refusal to challenge terms. So many abusive businesses would disappear overnight if suddenly their legal bills went through the roof.
There's no good faith in the vast majority of contracts anymore because all of it is take it or leave it levels of abusive.