Rock and Roll Drums: All You Need to Know
schoolofrock.com
schoolofrock.com
As for faves not mentioned: Alex Van Halen, Britt Walford of Slint and the Breeders, Bill Stevenson of Black Flag, Earl Hudson from Bad Brains, and Dave Lombardo and Paul Bostaph from Slayer.
Every car I get (currently have an Hyundai Elantra GT), I end up with the back seats down 75% of the time, and it just looks crappy. If the default mode was back-seats-down, with no big seams or gaps or unlevel parts, I'd be in heaven.
Not much, until you get to the cymbals.
Most of the drummers I've worked with are willing to put up with pretty much any drums, but always bring their own bag of cymbals. I don't think it's just a portability issue.
I sometimes work backline for festivals, and we usually will have an acrolite and whatever snare came with the shells (which are usually mid-line pro kits). The company has a black beauty and some other nicer stuff as well.
We also bring a fairly complete set of Zildgian A and a set of K.
Rarely do we pull that stuff out. Drummers almost bring their own cymbals, snare, and pedal. If they are flying in, usually they will still bring their brass.
edit: I will say there is an obvious influence of the wood type on the drums' response to temperature changes, and thus their tuning, so to the extent that that influences things, yes, there will be a difference. I'd like to see experiments controlling for all except wood type, however.
However, I do wonder about snare drums. I've heard a few different Noble & Cooley snares in studio settings, and the wood vs metal definitely sounded a lot different. But they _did_ have different heads on them...
I've got two snares, an aluminum Acrolite and a steel unknown-origin snare, and the character of each is extremely different.
I ran sound for a band where my roommate played drums, and he had a Noble and Cooley snare. But not just any Noble and Cooley… he had one of the Zildjian bronze snares. Those are rare in part because they can crack… and I'll tell you, the backbeat on that thing could absolutely take your head clean off. Diabolical. I imagine that they're so scarce because they simply explode onstage, killing everyone :D
I see there's one on Reverb for sale. AS DESCRIBED (so, use your eyes to see if there's a crack because no backsies) and still, $5,577.75 and $272 just to ship it. I can well believe it.
The wood definitely matters. Beginner kits are usually made out of poplar and even with good heads and tuning they just sound bad compared to a kit made with a wood known to sound better. Maple and birch are quite popular, oak, bubinga, and ash all make appearances on high-end drum sets. I used to work in a music store and saw a lot of drum kits come through, and high-end kits even with the same heads and tuning as low end kits do just sound better.
Also, in the rest of musical instruments, particular woods are valued for their acoustic properties especially on string instruments. So I don’t think it is that far-fetched to say that it makes a difference in drums too, unless you also want to argue that an acoustic guitar made of particle board vs one made of maple are the same. (They do not sound the same at all)
If all your drums are wearing pinstripes and are covered in moongel, your bass drum has a duvet in it, everything is close-miced and heavily EQ’d, etc, I’ll bet there’s no discernible difference between exotic wood types, or even other shell materials.
Nobody can tell that Danny Carey’s shells are forged from melted down Paiste cymbals. After all is said and done, it sounds the same as his older bubinga kit.
Most of the sound is going to come from heads, tuning, technique, microphones, mixing, the room, etc.
Hell, I bet even the bearing edge accounts for more sonic difference than shell material.
It's a "meta-instrument" instrument that has a level of customization to the individual that no other instrument goes near - in many cases you can tell a famous drummer just by looking at the disposition of their set! In many other instruments it's the player who has to adapt to said instrument, but with drums it happens quite the opposite.
Despite its avant-garde and ever-evolving nature, sometimes it baffles me that it's us players who sometimes haven't kept "in time" (no pun intended) with the instrument. I find it weird that the main reason people play hi hats cross-handed it's because a limitation in the hardware, namely the hi hat stand. Granted, there are now remote stands and you could place it almost anywhere, but they are still quite rare (and apparently even more expensive) and people just got along with the idea of having to play one of the most used pieces in the kit, precisely in rock styles, in a counter-intuitive place.
I think Bill Bruford could solve that drum layout issue perfectly, having his hats exactly on front on him and allowing him to be easily reachable with both hands without something else getting in the way (like Danny Carey). Alas it hasn't catched on because, again, people got so used to have their hi hats in a weird place that I bet many think that _it's the way we are intended to set our drums_.
Other of the head-scratching issues that even a century later is still alive is the stick grip thing. For many years they taught people traditional grip and told them that's the intended way to play drums (there's a funny rant from Buddy Rich around youtube about that matter), but as with the rise of rock styles people found that playing with a matched grip allowed them to play with more power, now they are telling people that playing matched is _the superior way_ to play drums (people of the likes of Thomas Lang, Matt Gartska and even the youtuber "the 80/20 drummer" are behind that idea).
But in reality even that comes down to the individual. I for one played with matched grip for 16 years and despite how much I did for my weak hand at the end I found my body is just not symmetrical. There's some tension in the tendons of my left hand it won't ever let me go anywhere near the flexibility of my right hand and feeling tension even when playing double strokes, no matter how relaxed. Re-discovering traditional grip was a moment of enlightenment for me and now I can't understand why people try to impose things as a grip as some sort of universal condition in the world of one of the most (if not the most) customizable musical instruments.
My experience mixing drums is limited… the way I’ve done it is by starting with overhead microphones to capture the sound of the full kit. This sounds kinda like what you hear live. I then mix in kick mics and snare mics, and run those through compressors and EQ. The compression you put on the kick and snare is a big chunk of the formula for getting drums to sound like rock drums. I was shocked the first time I heard it, because it goes from sounding like drums to sounding like rock drums.
Rock and roll has a very compressed sound to it. In the 1960s and 1970s it was a matter of necessity—you compressed so you could record a clean signal on tape, and then compressed some more because you liked it. Nowadays we use software to get similar results, either through emulations or new designs.
This does not apply to drums.
(source: crappy drummer me)
(source: crappy guitarist me)
Preserving your hearing is a factor.
Source: Bassist. ;-)
https://musictech.com/tutorials/technique-of-the-week-glyn-j...
A four-mic setup will have two overhead mics for stereo imaging and another dynamic mic on the snare drum; I would consider this the minimum for achieving a professional sound. Most mics introduced after this point will be additional spot mics like those already on the kick and snare drums; most drum sets will have two or more tom drums which benefit from a close-mic, and it is very common to mic the bottom head of the snare drum, against which the wires rattle, to combine with the more percussive sound of the top head.
My personal experience (and amount of equipment) runs out at this point; but one might add additional overhead microphones, or place microphones elsewhere in the room to capture more of the natural ambiance. A maximally-mic'd up drum set might have clip-on mics on the top and bottom of every shell drum (including the kick), two or three distinct models and placements of microphone on the snare, and spot mics for groups or even individual cymbals in addition to the overheads.
Regardless of the number of mics, the overhead microphones provide the foundational sound, and the spot mics sweeten the result. A comprehensive description of drum mixing goes beyond the scope of this comment, and for that matter I can only speak of how I mix drums for rock music. I would begin with compressing the feed from the overheads to bring forward the cymbals and the ringing of the snare, and then add punch from the spot mics. It's generally impossible to completely eliminate bleed between microphones, but isolation can be achieved in effect by gating the feed - muting the signal from a spot mic when it falls below a certain threshold. This way you can, say, run the feed from the snare through your favorite distortion effect without also amplifying the bleed from the cymbals that lies between them.
I think most people prefer mesh rather than rubber, but with a bit of luck and patience you can find a good budget used kit.
As a honkytonk sound guy I love good electric kits, but I have subs. They work great, though perhaps I'm just running into the really good kits.
I know a pro drummer who gave himself tendonitis from the rubber head kits, and having owned an octapad and similar triggers, I don't think I'd want to own anything that isn't a mesh headed kit.
I live in an apartment and have thought about getting one so I can rehearse a band in headphones, but they can often be quite loud just hitting em and they transmit noise through the structure. I don't think my downstairs neighbors would be okay with it; I don't enjoy it when their kiddos sometimes slam kitchen cabinets. So if that is your motivation, you might be careful about that.