Same, I made the poor judgement of subscription to Nord vpn years ago that I ended up not really using because many streaming sites blocked the vpn ips. Then I hear of the behavior of the company claiming they don’t take logs but they definitely take browsing logs. I felt like I was duped into a 2 or 3 year subscription upfront and didn’t really understand the product space or how to evaluate the different companies. Like are there any objective news sources to rank these services and what internet comments to trust at face value? I listened to a youtube ad in the first place, so I’m unsure what I was expecting.

Mozilla gained good will over the years and I like the browser. The vpn is fairly seamless and permissive for number of devices. I understand it is a wrapper on Mullvad and we are paying a healthy overhead. Still, it is worth it because I’d trust that if the vpn service provider behaves in bad faith that Mozilla will be able to quickly respond and adopt another provider. Whereas if it were up to me I may hear of it years later and not necessarily know what service to adopt instead.

My use is merely hoping to reduce tracking based on ip. I wouldn’t trust it to be subpoena proof. I’m not into pirating music anyway.