So its not just the megapixels, it is backed up an actually physically large sensor. Add in the great Xenon flash (which gives out much larger amount of light than say the tiny LED flash on the 4S) and you get a great cameraphone.
So its not just the megapixels, it is backed up an actually physically large sensor. Add in the great Xenon flash (which gives out much larger amount of light than say the tiny LED flash on the 4S) and you get a great cameraphone.
A typical phone has a 1/8" sensor. The iPhone 4S has a 1/3.2" sensor, which captures 6 times more light.
The N8 has a 1/1.9" sensor, so it captures almost 3 as much light as a 4S. 1/2" sensors are standard for point and shoot cameras, so differences in quality between point and shoots and the N8 would be mostly attributable to the optics of the respective cameras.
The 808 has a 1/1.2" sensor, so it captures 2.5 times as much light as the N8.
If you're keeping track, that's 44 times better than a typical camera phone.
This size is comparable to the worst compact DSLR's (the four-thirds system used by Olympus and Panasonic), although even cheap DSLR's are likely to have much better optics than a camera.
Are you sure? The article says the whole camera module is about 1cm in width and height. 4/3 sensors are 13x17mm.
Sensor sizes are very weird, 1/1.2" is not the diagonal: http://www.dpreview.com/learn/?/Glossary/Camera_System/senso...
Looking the table there, I would guess this sensor is about 10x7mm, which is huge for a compact camera and 4 times (not many) the area the iPhone 4S, but a quarter of a 4/3.
However, it's incredible they could fit the lens for such a sensor in a phone, and in fact you see in the video that it's already quite thick in the camera side.