Facts to back up that wide generic claim?
Facts to back up that wide generic claim?
Sparingly used so far, but in a bunch of places these laws could be applied very widely without changes to the law (ie. it would not require a 2/3 majority or anything like that, just an executive that changes a few judges around). The next Trump (probably "Le Pen" - remember that name, you'll be hearing it a lot) will make that happen, and she's probably got 40-45% of the vote (right now it might even be 60%, but that's mostly because everyone hates Macron). We are one election away from that happening.
While I don't agree with a lot of the far right rhetoric, I can understand the reason why people are fed up with immigration. Skilled labor is mostly excluded from all the laws on immigration. The intended target of the policies are people of MENA origin. 40 years of mostly failures with integrating them into the work force and picking up the tab for them leaves a bad taste in the mouth.
Also, I doubt very much that worldwide competition for skilled labor is a real problem for voters of right-wing parties. Or left-wing parties for that matter. Skilled labor is just not a sufficient percentage of the population to matter for voting.
And like I said, all it would take is a change in the executive.