Hacker News Reader

Comment by TeMPOraL | Hacker News Reader

> Only if the process was commonly known.

It doesn't matter - even if you're the only one to know the trick, once you start dumping large amounts of gold on the market, its price will start to go down. Gold isn't something that gets easily used up, so the more of it is in circulation, the cheaper it gets.

View on HN

Steady state thinking. Of course gold would become cheaper, sure. But you will have bought all the actual productive assets first!

This is the same trick economists play when saying "inflation doesn't matter". It doesn't in the steady state, but in the meanwhile, I printed the money and gave it to my friends, who do you think is going to end up owning all the hard assets?

In that time "ownership" of assets was a highly fluid concept. Kings nominally owned all the assets already, and as more than a few discovered, loose is the head that wears the crown.

You'd still make a ridiculous amount of money before that happened.

About as hypothetical argument as having access to billions of tons of gold that no one knows about but are willing to buy it

It's still working for diamonds.

Yeah, human psychology is the real philosopher's stone, huh? Make people feel like it's valuable and it becomes as such. If Graber's work is to be trusted the review of the development of gold as a token of exchange has little to do with its innate properties, and more to do with the fact that the state institutions demanded taxes be paid in said tokens.

Intriguing.

Fair point. Alchemists as good at marketing as DeBeers could make this work.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com