London Underground Dot Matrix Typeface
github.com
github.com
I wanted to have the same look, and I naively thought the same fonts would be important (and conveniently ignored the question of how to make high quality art, since I suck as an artist). So I got some graph paper and copied the two fonts by hand, pixel by pixel, off the screen -- the bold font with an outline used for dialogue, and the skinnier font used for the UI.
I never finished that graphic adventure (mainly due to not really having a plot, not due to technical difficulties), but the fonts looked pretty convincing! I think I still have that graph paper with the fonts in some box in the basement.
PS: OMG, I found an actual screenshot! https://gabrielgambetta.com/files/ne2.png Please enjoy my terrible 3D Studio skills and even wrose pixel art skills XD
https://sschueller.github.io/posts/vbz-fahrgastinformation/#...
At one point I considered selling it, but with the amount of legal stuff around CE marking I got demotivated. Plus these days you have https://tidbyt.com/.
I'm not a native speaker of English, but pretty sure that the word "tic" [sic] is not what you want. Look into apostrophes [1].
I wonder if it was the result of a study that concluded visibility was slightly increased over a consistent baseline due to the extra pixel of height for caps. Whatever the reason, it certainly gives the signs a quirky character (no pun intended).
Anyway, it works ok for most of the characters but it’s quite jarring for the Ki because it looks like the K descends into the i’s cell (though it doesn’t).
I'd be surprised if these fonts were not based on a study, or developed as part of a study to find a particularly legible dot-matrix font.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transport_(typeface)
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rail_Alphabet
Edit: I think we need TfL document 1-312 "Automated audio and visual information in public areas of stations and trains", but I can't find it online. Only the newer standards using LCD displays:
TfL Digital display standards: https://content.tfl.gov.uk/tfl-digital-display-standards.pdf
London Underground Good Practice Guide: Onboard Electronic Signing: http://www.signdesignsociety.co.uk/images/Knowledgebase/TfL_...
I figured the result was dictated by the specific dimensions and display density of hardware that matched the brightness/environment/size/etc requirements they set forth.
I know the care that goes into finding fonts for standardized government use (road signs, national parks, etc) but imagined this particular set of circumstances was confined to the displays commissioned in that particular round of updates and decided by the contractor and the liaison officials.
* https://www.youtube.com/@geofftech2/videos
A few years ago, he and his girlfriend/partner (Vicki) visited all (then) 2,563 railway stations in England, Wales, and Scotland:
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All_the_Stations
There's a couple of pubs in London (specifically close to underground stations) which have a notification boards above the bar for the next trains coming in and peering behind the notification display I see a Raspberry Pi dangling...
Here's the company that manufactured the ones for National Rail: https://trueform.com/products/next-train-indicator-nti/
https://wiki.openraildata.com/ has information about various open data feeds available for the railways in Great Britain, and https://tfl.gov.uk/info-for/open-data-users/ for TfL. Third party solutions for things like railway adjacent bars presumably use one of these to get departures board info etc.
On the other hand, the 1995 stock is very similar, same vendor, same era, likely identical display panels so I'd expect you could collect some of this data (e.g. London Zoo is accessed via the Northern Line, and that's a Z right there if the display mentions this) from those trains and assume it's the same.
U might show as "London Underground" at some point.
Does V show in "Change for the Victoria Line"? I can't remember if these trains show that.
They have done a great job on these fonts btw. They are instantly recognisable to any Londoner.
As a Britisher exported to the USA, the fonts and typography of government projects here regularly gives me the heebie-jeebies. I can't even bear to look at the highway signage.
Agreed, it's extremely distinctive.
P56 has what looks like the same font for London Overground: https://content.tfl.gov.uk/overground-signs-standard.pdf
And P47 for the DLR: https://content.tfl.gov.uk/dlr-signs-standard.pdf
https://britishrailmanual.com/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Rail_Corporate_Identit...
BTW, Stockholm's subway used to up until very recently have dot-matrix LED signs with what I think did a neat embedded-programming trick. They could switch between a static message and scrolling text, but the scrolling text was slanted.
I think the slanting was done by varying the timing for each row of LEDs. The bottom row was scrolled first, then the next above it after a short delay, and so on.
I have been thinking of trying that trick for making scrolling text legible on a keyboard with backlit keys in a traditional row-staggered configuration. But I would first need a keyboard PCB for DIY with individually addressable LEDs.
Maybe make each pixel 2LED×1LED (vertical).
This would be the equivalent of shifting it by adding an offset to the characterset bitmap that depends on the position vertically in glyph.
Without meaning to sneer, I can't help noticing this project represents a really trivial engagement with typography (dot matrix characters are really simply to copy). There's no craft involved, obviously, and not necessarily any taste either. Typography and graphic design in general are full of those things. Maybe the designers of the signage would have been able to shed some light on those aspects...
I'm speaking as a graphic designer who's been obsessed with typography for decades. Craft and taste are qualities I ordinarily pay a lot of attention to, and if petykowski had talked to anyone affiliated with these typefaces, I'm sure it would have been fascinating. But it's also important to remember that these faces are not in the same category as a high-end serif or something. They serve a bluntly functional purpose. The medium for which they're designed is entirely different. Of course they're simple and easy to copy; that's the point.
So I'm not sure how you are defining "craft" or "taste" here. These designs are crisp and legible. Your comment feels a little like somebody looking at an icon of Clarus the Dogcow (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dogcow) and saying "Ah, but where's the dimensionality? Where's the realism? Can this truly be considered a rendering of an animal? How lazy."
I personally love pixel/dot-matrix typefaces. I hadn't known about this project, so I'm grateful that somebody went to the trouble of doing this.
In my experience, there are primarily two kinds of graphical designers. (I don't have direct experience working with font designers, but I imagine they are kind of similar.)
1. Those who are great at it. They also tend to be humble and understand that often excruciating and boring iteration is critical in producing something great. When you find someone like this, hold on to them, whatever the cost.
2. Those who really want to be great at it but kinda aren't. They tend to develop a smug asshole attitude, perhaps as a defense mechanism. They often think their first iteration is a masterpiece that cannot be improved upon.
And there's a much larger superset/variant of the last kind that essentially consists of smug assholes who define themselves as being able to appreciate "good design", which invariably is defined as Apple's style of design.
At least the first display's font is fairly distinct, I haven't noticed it elsewhere. The bottom of the capital letters is a pixel lower than the lowercase letters.
Printed signs from Transport for London use Johnston Sans, noticeable with the diamond-shape dots on "i" and "j": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnston_(typeface)
[0]https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2F...