My favorite story from Daniel Ellsberg is „The Limits of Knowledge“ in this Mother Jones article:
https://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2010/02/daniel-ellsbe...
Of course, I need to think more deeply about this, because who's to say information asymmetries aren't essential (for some reason). But the perspective shared here is very interesting.
Thanks for sharing.
As a metaphor imagine if a game like chess required zero classified information: every move you make you need to disclose all your thinking and future moves to your opponent. You would be at a disadvantage.