Estimates suggest that 2/3 of the world's wildlife has died out in the past 50 years[1]. South America has lost more than 90% of its biodiversity. It's not clear what predictions you are claiming have failed. Are you arguing against making any effort to alter this trend?

https://f.hubspotusercontent20.net/hubfs/4783129/LPR/PDFs/EN...

Coincidentally here's an article about how many animals have been lost from various biomes since 1970: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/oct/30/humanity...

There is always someone with a vague reference to some undefined past prediction that didn't come true. This, "but why are the glaciers still here, what about the predictions" is really bogus. Rarely do I ever find that the predictions referenced are actually the predictions remembered by the denier.

Meanwhile, looking up past predictions, it easy to find them tracking. Even oil company predictions are tracking.

https://www.science.org/content/article/even-50-year-old-cli...

https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2023/01/harvard-led-a....

Yes, and it's provably happening but there's still an army of people willing to deny rapid extinction of many species. At what point will you be convinced?