> You just append ‘reply in json with this format’ and it does a really good job.
It does an ok job. Except when it doesn't. Definitely misses a lot of the time, sometimes on prompts that succeeded on previous runs.
It does an ok job. Except when it doesn't. Definitely misses a lot of the time, sometimes on prompts that succeeded on previous runs.
Danger! There be assumptions!!
gpt-? is a moving target and in rapid development. What it does Tuesday, which it did not do on Monday, it may well not do on Wednesday
If there is a documented method to guarantee it, it will work that way (modulo OpenAI bugs - and now Microsoft is involved....)
What we had before, what you are talking of, was observed behaviour. An assumption that what we observed in the past will continue in the future is not something to build a business on
This works well because it has a place to put any “keep in mind” noise. You can actually include that in your example.