Hydraulic warfare is here to stay. NATO should plan for it

defensenews.com

5 pointsjspencer5082 comments

Sure, but that's a weird name. There must be a better name for this kind of warfare - how about "flood warfare"?

Agreed. I just imagined a bunch of really slow catapults or people using Super Soakers when I saw the title.

Also. F. That.

War is terrible, it is so terrible we created _rules_ for it.

"I will do anything to kill your people, but I won't do that. No I won't do that."