The moral hazards of being beautiful
wsj.com
wsj.com
Well there goes the correlation/causation angle. I'm sure everyone has experience with seeing someone for the first time and thinking that they're incredible attractive until they open their mouth. The mind builds perception out of many signals and ocular vision is just one kind. Typically 'ugliness' is the presence of unwanted phenotypes, and in the absence of that 'ugliness' it's very easy to impute beauty.
I also think the idea that beautiful people become more likely to believe in a 'just world' is a strange way to think of it. If we're assuming a baseline level of selfishness, evolutionarily it would make much more sense for ugly people to try to shift consensus away from a 'just world' as doing so is likely to increase the amount of resources they receive. That is, instead of beautiful people recognizing their own privilege and thus lobbying for more, to me it makes more sense that people who don't see themselves as beautiful will tend to lobby for more beauty-blind practices. No one complains the deck is stacked when they're winning.
People that are “not winning” have no power
If anyone of them manages to get access to power now they are on the winning team - rinse/repeat
It’s not fun being in a coffeeshop and having middle age women blatantly stare at you and jockey to sit uncomfortably close. I’ve even had a few touch me without even speaking to me
I’m fortunate in that I don’t feel like my life is in danger but sometimes I just want to be left alone and yet if I go places I have to deal with the fact that eyes are on me and I’ll be approached when I don’t want to
Depending on your tolerance, this might be interesting to try out sometime:
https://www.nimbacreations.com/product/burn-victim-facial-tr...
Probably not in a location you're known though, and maybe not where people might react dangerously. :)
---
This might be easier to work with:
https://www.nimbacreations.com/product/slashed-smile-prosthe...
It is important to recognize that record as otherwise we stop being individuals with no recorded contribution nor merit.
[1] I the hate survivor bias as it is generally hard to refute it in human behaviors.
Similarly it's not quite fair to put it all down the luck. Unfortunately many traits are hereditary again here it's easier to ruin a hand than make a worse one work.
"It's a fact...that in societies like ours sex truly represents a second system of differentiation, completely independent of money; and as a system of differentiation it functions just as mercilessly. The effects of these two systems are, furthermore, strictly equivalent. Just like unrestrained economic liberalism, and for similar reasons, sexual liberalism produces phenomena of absolute pauperization . Some men make love every day; others five or six times in their life, or never. Some make love with dozens of women; others with none. It's what's known as 'the law of the market'...Economic liberalism is an extension of the domain of the struggle, its extension to all ages and all classes of society. Sexual liberalism is likewise an extension of the domain of the struggle, its extension to all ages and all classes of society."
Obviously, for the self perceived as inteligent and hard working people any privilege that is not inteligence is intolerable and should be fixed somehow. But if you have your PhD you somehow deserve all the privileges.
Exhibit 1 that IQ tests don’t predict general intelligence
It starts with the rise in dental braces (yes even among adults https://www.zocdoc.com/blog/the-adult-braces-boom-of-2021/) then goes to Botox or lip fillers and ends with the BBL.
The only recent year in which there was a decline in plastic surgery is when COVID cancelled elective surgeries, and then it shot right back up. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9886203/