Forget the influencers. Here come the ‘deinfluencers’
cnn.com
cnn.com
A "deinfluencer" would be someone that does _not_ affect or changes the way other people behave (like me).
Which is clearly not what this article implies with the term. The people described in the article are also influencers. They just provide negative reviews instead of (paid) positive ones.
A true defluencer would be someone who's not on those platforms. Slow news day at CNN?
The creators are very aware that they're also influencers.
See also: influencer dramas, commentary channels. Lots of people get a lot of views (and ad exposure) for manufacturing and amplifying stupid, childish dramas. It's like a distributed, bottom-up reality show - lots of people write pieces of the script in a collaborative, best-effort basis, and advertisers just laugh at the money they make on viewers sold on "authenticity".
Here I was thinking nothing could be worse than influencer culture ...
If so I'm down with it.