Hacker News Reader

From the sounds of the quality of ChatGPT's legal skills, you might be better off representing yourself.

These dudes are getting in trouble specifically for the shit answers spat out of chatGPT.

Or yeah you could just yolo your freedom away and represent yourself using a mathematical expression with zero motivations, perception, or emotion.

You missed what I was saying (or I communicated it poorly). I'm not suggesting people use ChatGPT for their lawyer. They're saying it's ChatGPT's fault that they provided wrong info. If they provide no value (no liability for the service provided, and no filtering/vetting of ChatGPT answers from their lawyer expertise), then why would people pay their fee?

Oh I see. Yeah 100% agree the people in the article are garbage lawyers.

So there are some bad lawyers therefore all lawyers are useless?

No, I'm saying if they think that it's to blame for wrong info and not themselves, then why should anyone pay for a lawyer instead of asking ChatGPT on their own?