Hacker News Reader

Comment by ahaucnx | Hacker News Reader

Author here.

I wrote this article a few weeks ago after discovering that a well known air quality monitor in the market that retails for more than USD 1000 actually uses a PM module that costs less than USD 20.

Often people assume that the more expensive, the better but as you can see in the article this is often not the case -especially when it comes to the accuracy of the monitor.

If you are looking for an open source / open hardware air quality monitor kit that uses high quality sensor modules and is very easy to assemble, have a look at the project we maintain. Instructions to built an indoor monitor [1], instructions to built an outdoor monitor [2] and overview of the kits [3]. All is open source (firmware, schematics, 3d files for enclosure, etc).

[1] https://www.airgradient.com/open-airgradient/instructions/di...

[2] https://www.airgradient.com/open-airgradient/instructions/di...

[3] https://www.airgradient.com/open-airgradient/kits/

View on HN

The same is true of digital bathroom scales. In fact almost all consumer grade digital scales have “fake accuracy” built into the firmware that ensures the same exact weight shows up when you step on the scale twice in a row, even if you pick up e.g a quarter-pound weight in your hand the second time

Yes, but do you(or someone else) have a recommendation of which scale does not do this? Something that's not consumer grade, but not "enterprise cost"

There are still inexpensive purely mechanical scales. I wouldn't expect much accuracy from a spring-based scale, but it should be consistent barring significant temperature variation.

My withings is constantly .2 fluctuating. If it’s faking that I’m going to chuck it out the window. It’s a very good scale, in aggregate the readings are useful.

Another shout out for Withings, I definitely do not recognize the fake accuracy problem with this scale

I made good experience with an Omron BF 511. As far as I know it doesn’t do this, would have to test though.

The bodyfat measurement is good enough to be usable and the same scale is working in our household for almost 10 years now I believe.

Eufy smart scale P2 Pro. $79.99

It has wifi and bluetooth, so it always syncs up with your phone and can track multiple people. I don't really trust the body measurement stuff but use it for measurement per measurement information. The heart rate is kind of nice to track too.

Even cheaper, and IMO slightly more reputable, the $50 withings scale is pretty great, and it's half the price of the version with useless body composition measurements.

Looks good too. I bought pre-doorbell controversy along with a doorbell. It appears Eufy/Anker is doing better now.(0) After having a couple different webcams taken over by security holes, mine only point outside and are hidden.

0. https://www.theverge.com/23573362/anker-eufy-security-camera...

What about getting two cheap scales and averaging their values? From my third-world perspective, it sure beats the other suggestion from one of the other commenters to get a $80 digital scale with bluetooth, wifi, fridge and Amazon prime integration.

A cool tip I've seen before is to buy medical/laboratory equipment for scales. No fancy features, just durable build and accurate results.

I have looked for this myself, and come to the conclusion that it doesn't exist unless you're willing to buy a second hand, bulky hospital scale.

Measuring human weight is harder than it seems (we don't stay still).

Most scales use a strain gauge sensor that detects bending of a metal arm through changes in resistance. It's pretty noisy and needs averaging. There's some integrated circuits to relate the resistance to weight. Most do some factory calibration only around the target weights (median adult weights).

Look instead for a scale that explicitly states that it is accurate over the whole range (e.g. baby to 220lbs). Usually there's tradeoffs - e.g. the displayed weight won't 'settle down'. I have one like this and it works better than any previous one I had (tested by adding calibrated weights), but I hesitate to recommend since it's a low cost consumer model.

My $10 +decade old one CR2032 powered one does that just fine.

Accurate enough for weight control (doesn't drift from day to day), no "stuck weight" problem mentioned either. Just need to wait 2 seconds for self calibration to finish

If your scale doesn't give you a different weight from one day to the next, either you are a very unusual human that doesn't ever change weight somehow, the scale only gives two sig figs, or it's lying to you.

Humans are constantly changing weight, with every single breath you take.

I eat once a day and weight myself in the morning before eating or drinking anything, hence the consistency. If I weight myself in other parts of the day I get different results so it isn't just weight stuck at same level. So I can see the trend based on what I ate last few days pretty quickly.

I also tested on small weight and what my kitchen weight calls 3.016KG my bathroom weight calls 3.0KG so I'm pretty sure it's still reasonably accurate in absolute scale.

> I also tested on small weight

You need to weight youself and then weight yourself again with something of known weight in your hands.

Floor scales usually aren't good at a small weights, though I wouldn't be surprised if they are not bad at it nowadays.

Even without endorsing, could you at least tell us the model?

Avec Maman AM05

The Nintendo Wii balance board is the only good scale you can get and it isn't expensive. A balance board, Wii, and small TV is probably around $500.

You don't even need the Wii itself! You can connect to the balance board via Bluetooth, and there are several libraries out there that can read out its data (and that of the Wiimotes as well).

Do they give you the same feedback about shifting your weight so that you get an acceptably small deviation between the four sensors?

Yes, you get all the data. Sometimes you can see even more than what the Wii shows you. For example, with the Wiimotes, it actually shows you the position and brightness of the top 3 or 4 infrared light sources in its field of view (from that it can derive the position of the "sensor" bar).

If you have a link, it would be much appreciated. When I looked I didn’t see anything that came close to the functionality that the Balance Board had when attached to the Wii. It’s nice that the raw data is available, but unless it’s presented in a way that’s useful, it’s not that interesting.

The only project I found was FitScales and it has been dead for a long time now because Android Bluetooth changes made it incompatible with newer devices.

The Withings scales definitely do not.

Personally, I've only ever had one scale in my life that I thought might be using memory to give false consistency. But even then, it was short-term, not long term. I.e. if you stepped off and back on, it might bias towards giving you the same weight. If you walked away for a bit, then came back with a small extra weight in your hand, it was accurate.

I just pick up a five pound weight and step on the scale, then put it down and step off. Step on again, and get he correct weight.

Annoying, but it works.

Thats like having a car that always drives me somewhere I don't want before it drives me where I want. What the actual f*ck. How are people okay with having such garbage in their homes. Why not just buy an analog spring scale...

Because like anything analog these days, they are hard to find?

No they're not.

I can find mechanical scales very easily in the Netherlands, but they're more expensive. On Alibaba I see that digital bathroom scales are about $2.50 and with WiFi/Bluetooth it's $6, mechanical scales are double that at $12 while also taking up more volume (more pallets and containers). With volume scale and unique designs, your own skin on the apps, and market specific packaging the margins are only going to get better for the (connected) digital scales.

You have to take into account that a digital scale, especially one with an app, is going to be collecting endless amounts of data about you and selling it to anyone willing to pay. Your digital scale will end up costing you again and again for the rest of your life, every time someone uses that data against you. You'll just never be told when it's happening.

...get one without WiFi ? My takes one CR2032 battery every ~7 years

You're right that they're probably harmless if they're not connected to the internet and can't interact with a cell phone.

I suspect the scale being accurate +-30g is sufficient for personal weight management unless you’re a professional boxer or need it to be exact for some reason.

> Why not just buy an analog spring scale...

Because digital scales have features that analog ones do not. And contrary to an earlier assertion that 'almost all' scales lie to get consistent results, this is very much not true. There are reputable digital scales that do not behave that way.

I wouldn't say it's the same.

Low cost air quality measurement is difficult. PM is tricky but almost manageable with laser scattering, toxic gases at typical inquinant concentrations are almost impossible to get right with electrochemical sensors, no matter how much money you throw at them.

Weight measurement is easy, they could give you precise and accurate results but most customer base doesn't understand anything of physical quantities measurement and would panic they gained 50g in a minute if they showed up the real fluctuating values by stepping on the scale twice.

Easy solution though, just limit the scale's display to a magnitude that it can accurately measure reproducible.

This is how the market for scales works: You buy a scale for the weight class you're planning on measuring. For example, you can't buy a scale made for weighing humans and expect it to be useful for weighing herbs or jewelry.

It's because of how load cells (and scales) are manufactured. They're made for weight classes like 100g, 1kg, 2kg, 3kg, 5kg, 10kg, etc. So to make a scale for a particular weight you pick the load cells you'll need for the range you want.

Higher quality scales don't select higher quality load cells; they're all the same (reasonable quality) for the most part! Instead they just use more load cells and just take an average of all their values, multiplied by the number of cells, to measure weight.

So if you want a damned accurate industrial scale for measuring weights around 1kg you'd use like twelve 100g load cells rather than a single 2kg load cell or two 1kg load cells. Of course, then the hard part becomes, "how do I distribute this weight perfectly evenly across all of them?" so you have to take tolerances into account to make sure that at no point can weighing part of your scale rub against the side of its container or accidentally get something wedged between the scale part and the case.

There's loads of other things to consider as well but for the most part the accuracy of the scale is a factor of how many load cells its using, not the quality/manufacturing tolerances of the load cells themselves. Because even with the most precise manufacturing methods load cells will still drift and be impacted by temperature. All you can do is calibrate regularly, test them, and hope for the best (or use a completely different technology).

Easy solution if your customer understands accuracy. They don't.

They want the highest resolution so they can see their 10 gram progress when dieting. But they want the measurement to be stable enough to not cause them too much anxiety.

>They want the highest resolution so they can see their 10 gram progress when dieting.

Do they? 100g is already quite granular, and you can lose that in a day.

I have two scales which are giving me different measures - I've been weighting myself and assume I'm in the middle of both. It's a bit annoying, but works for my goals.

No, they lie to cover up the cheapness and inadequacy of their flextures. "Users can't handle the truth" is a bullshit excuse and you should be ashamed for making it.

That seems like an unnecessary escalation. It's possible that OP has observed what they're describing before.

Yeah, but I've observed patronizing excuses for corporate misbehavior before and they trigger me a bit, what can I say.

My point was not to patronize anyone. My point was that one measurement (air quality) is difficult from a physics and technology standpoint. Low cost accurate air quality measurement at consumer level is not possible no matter how much you are willing to spend.

The other one, weight, is easy enough and if it's not accurate it is for commercial reasons. Either because what I said or what you said. Both could be true.

Whoah there: Your typical (cheap) consumer scale will have four (50kg) load cells hooked up to an hx711 (or clone) and the cheapest microcontroller the manufacturer could find that can drive an LCD directly.

Even the cheapest load cell is pretty damned accurate and the average between the four of them is going to be accurate within 0.1kg (~0.22lbs). Having said that, load cells have this problem where their values drift over time but only if there's a constant weight on them. If you step off the scale and allow it to re-calibrate itself (which is what it does every time it turns on) there will definitely not be enough drift to matter from a, "how much do I weigh?" standpoint. All it takes is like 2 seconds without weight for a load cell to "settle down" back to its not-actually-very-noisy resting position.

I've tested loads of the cheapest possible load cells money could buy along with some load cells I took from an expensive transparent scale that had cracked. They were all far more accurate than I was expecting and any differences between them was negligible.

The longer you wait before weighing something the less accurate it'll be but only by tiny, negligible amounts. Like, if you're weighing something that's 100kg and you waited ten minutes after calibration (something most scales won't allow because they all have something like a 30-second timeout) you'd still get a value that's within 0.01 of 100kg. They don't drift that much at rest unless there's some serious temperature variations or you had something resting on the scale the entire time.

When you cheap out on flextures, it's not the accuracy under ideal perpendicular loads that goes, and cheap housings struggle to provide ideal perpendicular loads. These are not particularly difficult things to get right, but the construction of even relatively expensive ($150) scales is so cheap that it screws this up and results in >1% deviation over the surface of the scale if you bypass the digital cheating mechanism.

Is it a big problem? No, but there's a fake decimal and an attempt to hide that the decimal is fake. Not cool.

What the heck are you talking about? The only flexure to speak of is within the load cell itself and... Can you even call that a flexure? It's a teeny tiny strain gauge mounted on a piece of steel that's going to bend ever so slightly when a weight is put on it. Even the cheapest load cells are precision-manufactured well within the tolerances necessary for the strain gauge to give you damned accurate results.

I've never seen a human weight scale that went beyond a single decimal place and in all honestly they're going to be very accurate. If you get on the scale and it says 201.2lbs that measurement is going to be accurate within ±0.1lbs (actually, more than that but you only get one decimal point of precision). If you put the scale next to something that's emitting a ton of electrical noise then maybe it'll be off by 0.2lbs but I doubt it.

Meanwhile, a precision of +-0.1lbs to measure humans is entirely superfluous. You can fluctuate an entire pound over the course of a day and your weight is not normally stable day to day. Analog scales only gave you about 2 sig figs, and that was probably a better outcome.

Thanks for posting, this explains why a $20 scale I got off Amazon which for some reason doesn't have the memory/smoothing feature is so impressively linear.

My cat sat on it, read 9.4lb. I stood on it, it gave my weight, then I picked up my cat and it read (my weight + 9.4)lb.

I was impressed!

That should be outright illegal... Why do they allow equipment that deliberately lies to the user?

Because "they" have more influence in politics than the user.

Ah yes, the political conspiracies of “Big Scales”.

So you are claiming corporations affect regulations less than users? Doesn't match what I am observing as someone literate in (at least some) norms and regulations.

What I wrote sounded more conspiratorial than I am planned, but I stand by the opinion that coperate interests are overrepresented in regulations.

Because users want to be lied to?

Because the user otherwise will spot the discrepancy and pronounce "these scales are rubbish" (which in a way they are).

So why not fix the scale so it isn't rubbish?

That costs more, and the consumer wouldn’t buy it.

Cost.

They system has found an equilibrium: customers are willing to pay ~$X for a scale. For $X you can afford Y accuracy.

If you increase the accuracy, great, but now your scale costs more then $x.

Why are pharmaceutical companies allowed to sell medicine that has no improvement over placebo? See phenlyephrine which is in every single OTC decongestant/cold medication

That’s specifically because the DEA and congress cracked down on the useful alternative.

That doesn't explain why they're allowed to sell something that doesn't actually do anything while claiming it does. It just explains why they want to.

I'm not actually sure now you mention it; it used to be a serious crime to mess with weights and scales, when they were used for weighing coins. Probably still is.

Most consumer grade personal scales are not certified medical devices like the blood pressure meters and scales at your GP's office.

Surprisingly my random scales off of Amazon do not do this. Accurate both times.

Source on that ? Never saw that and just checked my cheapo, it doesn't do it

My Bowflex scale does this. I tend to switch modes / user profiles if I care about accuracy.

See mine is too cheap to have any logic or memory in it

shrug I bought it for $39 about 11 years ago.

I paid $8 at least decade+ ago. I'm actually surprised it haven't fallen apart by now, it was "designed" by local company and of course made in china.

I can recommend Xiaomi Smart Scale 2 (not the body composition one, it's nonsense). It is very accurate and repeatable. So much so, that you can see your weight drop after you go to the toilet.

It is fascinating how much one's weight fluctuates during the day (or night which is even weirder if you don't eat/drink anything!)

Can confirm that! My morning routine includes “removing” any extra weight before weighting myself. It is very accurate.

It's like a game comparing the measurements

> So much so, that you can see your weight drop after you go to the toilet.

That works with my NoName NoSmart TwentyBucks Scale scales too.

At night you still sweat and breathe. In fact weight loss in general occurs by breathing. Your body gets energy by breaking carbon bonds, then disposes of the carbon via breathing out CO2.

There is zero way your body is losing a quarter pound at night through either process in a room at 70 degrees

A quarter pound is only just over 100 grams, or about two shot glasses; you'll just breathe that out as water vapor, and then some. Plus sweating happens even when you're not feeling moist.

According to [0], humans exhale about 11.0L of CO2 per hour at night. 02 in, CO2 out, so we can get mols of gas with ideal gas law and mass loss with molecular weight of carbon. If I did my math right, it comes out to 53.9g over 8 hours of sleep (if you can get that much ). (Americans: 0.118 lb/night). Not quite a quarter pound but maybe closer than you thought!

[0]https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ina.12911

Also, a Quarter Pounder is 417 Calories which is a bit less than 2000*8/24, so that checks out.

We also lose H20 through exhalation. I imagine that can make up the difference.

For sure, I would expect it to be more than the carbon difference. I think it would depend a lot more on circumstance so I couldn't really put concrete numbers to it here.

Another way to look at this is the human body stores energy in glucose and fat

Fat is 77% carbon by weight, and glucose is 40% carbon by weight (C18H34O2, C₆H₁₂O₆) . All off that carbon is broken down to CO2 and removed by the blood and lungs.

2000 calories of fat is 0.57 lbs, and 0.44lbs of carbon. 2000 calories of glucose is 1.14 lbs, and 0.46lbs of carbon.

The carbon masses are similar because the energy we use comes from breaking the carbon-carbon bonds these molecules.

This means you exhale about a 0.45 lbs of carbon per day for baseline metabolism. Each pound of fat you lose is another 0.77 lbs of carbon on top of this (over however long you lost it).

Compairing to your numbers, the approach above means you exhale 200g of carbon a day, and 8.3g/hr. If you sleep for 7 hours, that is 58 grams of carbon exhaled (pretty close).

Veritasium did a video on this. He lost around 250g each night, which is over half a pound. Some of that lost weight was CO2, some of it was water vapor and some of it was sweat.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lL2e0rWvjKI

Thanks for info - happy to accept I was wrong :)

The one I have at least registers ~1 or 1.5#, uhmmm, shall we say "sudden losses of weight".

My bathroom scale shows tenths of a pound, but I think it's just because it's actually measuring some other unit (tenths of a kilo, maybe?), then converting that to pounds.

I say that because it seems like certain tenths of a pound are outright impossible to achieve.

While I admire the efforts of the SC-AQMD, and generally agree with the article, using R2 from a higher-end, but not quite perfect instrument, can be quite misleading, and is not a great indicator of actual sensor performance. Also, there are a lot of potential improvements in sensor tech, but instead almost everyone is relying on the same cheap sensor modules instead of innovating, which have have pretty bad deficiencies, especially in detecting particulates in the ultra-fine range, and don’t age very well. But, they are the cheapest.

The R2 is between the tested monitor and the AQMD reference instruments (BAMs and Grimms). They also test if the two reference instruments agree with each other before calculating the correlation to the tested monitor.

So I believe their testing method is quite accurate.

This is probably a longer discussion, but PM0.3 (anything less than 0.3 microns) is quite difficult to measure, especially optically, as light scattering drops off very steeply once your particle sizes are around the wavelength of the light being used. Anything short of an SMPS class instrument that “grows” small particles through condensation so that they appear large enough to be counted, will not see much below 0.3 microns. Also, the total MASS of small particles might be low, but if you look at count, or lung-deposited surface area, we get a different picture. Especially around 0.3um, particulate matter is prone to get deep into the lungs, instead of being caught in the upper airways, and the small size means larger relative surface area, and thus higher reactivity. Even smaller nano particles might not go as deep, but are more likely to enter cells or the bloodstream due to their minuscule size.

> I wrote this article a few weeks ago after discovering that a well known air quality monitor in the market that retails for more than USD 1000 actually uses a PM module that costs less than USD 20.

This may be true for off the shelf air sensors, but in general the base cost of the sensor is not necessarily correlated with achievable accuracy. There are even manufacturers like Maxim who will sell you sensors for cheap, but you pay a lot to license firmware to get the best performance (and in this case actually a smoke/particle detector if I remember right - the MAX30105).

You might pay thousands for a third party calibration on top of the OEM device. For example an infrared calibration target is a puck of coarsely machined metal, a heater cartridge and some black paint, but you're paying $$$ for NIST traceability, guaranteed measurements of the emissivity, etc.

https://hackaday.com/2017/04/11/ask-hackaday-how-does-this-a...

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002185022...

You appear to be using CC BY-NC (although it's ambiguous if that applies to the schematics/3d files or only the instructions?) which isn't an open source licence, as it violates point 6 of the open source definition. [0]

Sorry to be pedantic, but it spoils an otherwise interesting looking project.

[0] https://opensource.org/osd/

We use CC BY-SA 4.0, see for example here [1] which is open-source 'compatible'. We used -for a short time NC- but not anymore. Where did you see the NC license? Maybe we forgot to update it somewhere?

We also wrote a blog post about our decision to use CC BY-SA [2].

[1] https://www.airgradient.com/open-airgradient/instructions/di...

[2] https://www.airgradient.com/open-airgradient/blog/thoughts-o...

It's at the bottom of the first link you posted https://www.airgradient.com/open-airgradient/instructions/di...

It's great that you chose to switch to an open source compatible licence.

Thanks for spotting this. I will change it later today.

Fixed

You might know or know what kind of academics or something I could ask, but how do I go about photographing and videoing and proving cigarette smoke? Best I can figure blue lasers or very strong blue LED lights but "this smoke is cigarette smoke" is givin me trouble got asthma keep getting "smoke free" apartments that put me next to chronic smokers and all the law will do if I ain't got proof is let me break the lease. That's happened several times so far but if I can get proof "this is cigarette smoke it only comes from this apartment" I can get rid of the person instead of being forced to move for the 5th time

Have you compared the Sensirion SEN55 against the Plantower sensors? I ask because I’ve recently picked up both and have played around with them each individually but haven’t compared them for accuracy yet. The nice thing about the SEN55 is that it contains all of the sensors in one unit (PM1.0 to PM10.0, temperature, Relative Humidity, NOX and VOC).

They do cost a little bit more than the Plantower units, about $30-40USD. For anyone looking at the Sensirion sensors, be aware that the SEN5x products span a range, and only the SEN55 has all of the above sensors in one unit. I’ve found the Sensirion software to be pretty nice to work with. I was able to port their embedded i2c example repo to ESP32 with little trouble.

Yes, we are looking at the SEN55. The reason we currently still use the Plantowers is that there is a lot more research out there on the Plantower and how it behaves in different environments.

I would definitely like some research into the SEN5x line of sensors. I have three air quality monitors in the house. Two of them are AirGradient kits (Basic and Pro), with the other one I made myself using a SEN55 and SCD41. All of them are using ESPHome for the firmware.

With the current very bad air quality in the US Northeast, I noticed that the SEN55 was reading much higher than the two Plantowers in the AirGradients. At one point, the SEN55 was reading around 200µg/m³, while the Plantowers were reading around 100µg/m³. I am planning on buying a second SEN55 to check this.

+1 for the SEN5X. Incredible little sensor. I picked up a devkit a year ago when it first came out, intending to build an OSS AQM around it, but alas, time and young kids got in the way. I'm really hoping it gains traction in the community.

I am actually not surprised as ai noticed similiar non-correlation of price and quality with different products.

For headphones someone made a small analysis regarding at leat frequency response and price: https://pubs.aip.org/asa/jasa/article/141/6/EL526/917945/No-...

Please could you consider changing the CSS on the article. At the moment, the web page has "display: block" on almost everything, which does exactly what it says on the tin and produces a blank white page, which does make it a little difficult to read the content.

Browser reading mode is good for fixing this

`Display: block` doesn't hide content; that's what `display: none` does.

https://www.w3schools.com/cssref/pr_class_display.php

I stand corrected. But anyhow, something in the css is making it show just a blank white page.

Out of interest what are your thoughts on the Aranet4? (other than it's quite high price of course).

As far as I know the Aranet uses NDIR CO2 sensor modules from SenseAir. We do use the same brand in our DIY kits and they are very accurate and probably one of the best low-cost CO2 sensors.

Cool, good to know. Thank you for taking the time to respond!

What is the difference between the indoor/outdoor kit? It seems the outdoor one contains more sensors but is less expensive? (or is this a nod to the article in some way ;))

My partner has a pottery studio with a kiln, it can get pretty smoggy in there when a firing is taking place (its unoccupied during, but it takes a while to settle afterwards), so I want to get a sensor. Are there any add-on sensors you can think of that would be useful in addition to assess off-gassing of VOCs (or something else?) from the kiln firing?

The outdoor kit focuses on PM measurements with dual PM modules for enhanced accuracy. The indoor kit has in addition CO2 and an optional TVOC sensor.

I think for a pottery studio to measure PM and VOCs is a good start (and CO2 to see how well the ventilation works).

Have you looked into the longevity of the Plantower PM sensors outdoors? I have long wanted to have one outside but I've always been reluctant because there is a lot of pollen around where I am during the warmer months and I assumed that would clog them up fairly quickly.

Outdoors we see quite different lifetimes with the Plantower. Sometimes insects are getting into it and reduce the lifetime. No experience with pollen.

Thanks! Order placed :)

I would buy a couple of these in an instant, it's exactly what I want, except it's so BIG. I want something as small as reasonably possible.

We originally designed a smaller monitor but it makes it very difficult to get an accurate temperature reading because the enclosure heats up and you cannot have a good distance from the active components to the temperature sensor.

Wouldn't just correction factor be enough ? If device takes constant power it should also heat the sensor by constant amount

Yes to some extent but the correction factors will be influenced by absolute temperature levels, airflow in the room etc.

Would probably be easier in all-in-one integrated sensor and not "a bunch of separate parts" as then the temp sensor could just be near incoming air so any heating from the board would be offseted by that

Thank you very much for explaining.

I'm happy with that, and I will place an order.

Just a note to say that I bought the Air Gradient pre-soldered indoor monitor kit. It was simple to put together and I appreciate the lack of a required cloud server connection. I'm glad to the the outdoor monitor kit is now available - just in time for fire season!

Interesting analysis!

Minor typo throughout: It's R^2 instead of R_2.

Also surprised the dataset doesn't include Awair's products!

Thanks! Fixed.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com