Not saying one is more illegal/legal than the other, but they certainly acted differently.
Not saying that it couldn't be, but the greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist.
Binance acts like this because complying with US law is ridiculously expensive. Binance cares most about serving the remaining 95% of humanity that does not live in the US. Maybe seven years or so ago they really started shifting things around so their US services are expendable, and could be jettisoned at any moment if US regulators start biting.
Both are entirely reasonable strategies, and it's why I, as a US citizen, moved everything I had in Binanace away 7 or so years ago, and only ever do anything custodial with Coinbase. Back in the before times, I had accounts across multiple global exchanges so I could run arbitrage bots etc, but now it's basically Coinbase or nothing when it comes to custodial exchanges.
That totally explains why they put so much effort into catering for US whales.
https://www.federalreserve.gov/central-bank-digital-currency...
Another case of Alstom or even BlackBerry..
[1] https://www.americanbar.org/groups/litigation/committees/wom...
It doesn't look like anyone is going to outright lose assets - but perhaps not the able to withdraw for some period of time?
Withdraw to cold storage, dump everything except bitcoin, and of course, do your own research.
“Tortilla! Not your keys, not your coin! Eat your vegetables.”
If you really don't want to self-custody, probably the next safest option is to skip all the new crypto companies and instead use one of the traditional finance companies that's starting to branch into crypto (like Fidelity)
You either need to be day trading off the wild fluctuations in different coins prices, which requires working through an exchange, or you need to be "investing" in various scams and hoping to get your money back out before the rugpull.