I obviously did not mean "unified memory" in that sense. In that sense even Apple I in 1976 had "unified memory" [1] [2]. The sense in which I meant it, following the spirit of the above paper/thesis, which no one seems to have read because they were too quick to jump on the bashing bandwagon, was unified memory performing "stream computing", e.g. an Apple Silicon chip running a local large language model. And if you get to run Vicuna 13B or something else on an Intel Tiger Lake or similar, more power to you, and to us if you make it open source.

[1] "The display section contains its own memory, leaving all of RAM for user programs", http://s3data.computerhistory.org/brochures/apple.applei.197...

[2] "Running Apple 1 software on a breadboard computer (Wozmon)", https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HlLCtjJzHVI