Fantastic would be 25fps, this isn't there yet.
So for 2020 laptop chip, it's pretty great achievement I'd say!
I don't know of any project that does X86 -> ARM this well
I'm wondering if this is also translating the binary with Rosetta.
Here is what you said, though:
> Fantastic would be DXVK approximate levels of performance hit. This is far short of that.
This is at about 50% performance drop translating DX12 to Metal, on top of the drop from Rosetta.
At 1440p, and if we take this [0] at face value, it would be 50% of the performance of a RX 6700 XT paired with a 5950X, both desktop parts, which I think is pretty good.
[0] https://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/cyberpunk-2077-pc-pe...
The m1 gpu is broadly equivalent to a gtx 1650 in a host of benchmarks. This is getting less than half the fps a gtx 1650 does at these settings, and I am being charitable.
I don't know why you are looking at 1440p (2560 x 1440) as the m1 here is running at 1440x900. While I'm there, that 6700 XT posts 50fps, half of which is 25fps, which would indeed be alright. However this is putting out less than 15fps most of the time.
Have a nice day.
Ah, you are right, I messed up with the resolution.
> The m1 gpu is broadly equivalent to a gtx 1650 in a host of benchmarks.
Which ones?
> This is getting less than half the fps a gtx 1650 does at these settings, and I am being charitable.
... without having to emulate both CPU architecture and graphics layer.
I mean, this is not really a debate. DXVK is not comparable, Wine does not do the same either. We are talking about translating both CPU instructions and graphic API calls in real time, good enough that a triple A game runs without any modification on a laptop with 16GB of shared memory.
It is.
>Game Porting Toolkit can translate controller inputs, audio and graphics APIs, CPU instructions, and other APIs automatically.
https://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/apple-enabled-thousa...
I have fond(?) memories of playing Doom on a 386 with a monochrome passive TFT screen.