I'm trying to understand why you think "closeness to space" would be a factor. Maybe you are thinking that the seabed is going to be further from a detector than the terrain would be?
It is true that the further from the Earth the detector is, the smaller the anomaly will be.
Note that even hills are large enough to deflect the gravitational vector at the surface: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vertical_deflection
Why do you think the concentration of iron in magma would not be evenly distributed throughout the mantle?
Gravity cares about distance and mass, and as large parts of the planet move their density distribution shifts affecting both of those factors
I love how the IQ of this place keeps spiraling downward.