Twitch’s New Branded Content Guidelines
help.twitch.tv
help.twitch.tv
https://twitter.com/Twitch/status/1666183145526538240
Today’s branded content policy update was overly broad. This created confusion and frustration, and we apologize for that.
We do not intend to limit streamers’ ability to enter into direct relationships with sponsors, and we understand that this is an important part of how streamers earn revenue.
We wanted to clarify our existing ads policy that was intended to prohibit third party ad networks from selling burned in video and display ads on Twitch, which is consistent with other services.
We missed the mark with the policy language and will rewrite the guidelines to be clearer. Thank you for sharing your concerns, and we appreciate the feedback. We’ll notify the community once we have updated the language.One prominent twitch steamer (MoistKritical)’s response pulls no punches https://youtu.be/-5zGuFPxW88
It’s crazy to me when you think about the sporting example. If you watch a sporting event there are billboards next to the field, there are ads on players’ clothes etc. The broadcaster doesn’t get to monopolise ad and sponsorship revenue.
I think twitch are wildly overplaying their hand here. It’s not like they have a great service that people will be reluctant to leave or replace. Twitch itself is basically horrible. The only reason to be there is if you like the content. If prominent streamers and events leave they have literally nothing.
They force you to have their ads, but give you no revenue. Any source of revenue you manage to have gets hit by a 50:50 split, streamers can get banned anytime for vague reasons (like a vtuber showing too much "skin" e.g. vei (veibae) recently, but not equally enforced, particularly meat-based streamers tend to get a pass) and on top of that they want streamers to be captive on Twitch through these new measures against streaming to multiple sites.
It is an abusive relationship.
I hope this is the last "kick" streamers need to just move on to greener pastures.
It would be great if one of the larger corpos simply moved all its streamers, and this set a trend.
That seems to be the problem, what are they? E.g. even pulling over some large streamers didn't make Mixer attractive enough in the end, YT streaming also seems a separate thing and is IMHO similarly likely to make bad policies, ...
Even moderately large vtuber agencies (e.g. vshojo) have constant trouble with Twitch, with their streamers getting arbitrarily banned, sometimes right on their debuts.
With the last batch of changes, it makes sense to go elsewhere. From a business continuity perspective, it is already a no-brainer. Moist is completely on point.
Twitch is way too abusive, and its corporate culture issues seem far too deeply rooted, only getting worse over time.