I think without shared reality in place, the public verdict on this device will be that it's a loneliness enabler, or has you wear your loneliness on your face. Or rather, on a screen strapped to your face. It's going to be undesirable, the most damning quality of any consumer item. Nobody will envy their peers for having one.
Besides which, nobody is looking into my home and calling my various screens "loneliness enablers". Not that I would give a shit if they were, though I might invest in some blinds or drapes.
I'm saying the "Apple goggles" can so easily fall victim this perception because those qualities are so front-and-center with it.
And I'm saying nobody will ultimately give a crap if the tech works as well as Apple wants it to. Our social spaces have been utterly transformed by screens and networked technology in the last few decades, and while there is always some pushback, progress marches on for better or worse.
This clashes with my model of how humans work and socialize. We'll see!
No one ever has a ring tone anymore.
The glasses are extreme expensive and they are not replacing anything.
Someone with an ipad still needs the glasses and the other way around.
You are sweating in these things.
I can eat while watching on my OLED.
And the glasses are also expensive for companies. So no typical iphone as company phone thing.
Well, they're essentially pitched as a replacement for laptops, tablets, and for some users TVs too. No product category goes from zero to full adoption in a day (look how long it took for laptops!) but saying this headset isn't pitched as a computer replacement is flat out wrong.
> Someone with an ipad still needs the glasses and the other way around.
Why? You're losing the drawing tablet functionality, which I assume most iPad owners don't use, and what else?
It's too bulky for a laptop