If a programmer can get no value from AI then they aren't trying hard enough, or they are dramatically overvaluing their capabilities.
I wouldn't hire a programmer who said they don't use AI because it doesn't help them.
I wouldn't hire a programmer who said they don't use AI because it doesn't help them.
I don't use "AI" to help me write code, it doesn't help me enough to offset the constant context switching, and then having to double-check what it spits out. For the same reason, I don't have a junior-level human assistant to pair with because that would slow me down.
Thanks for the heads-up, so those of us not getting enough value out of "AI" (about half according to the other comments) know not to apply. I have worked for plenty of managers and executives who can't write a memo or a spec as well as ChatGPT, I suspect those jobs will go to "AI" before my prospects dry up.
I'm sure AI will close that gap ;)