> "All attorneys appearing before the Court must file on the docket a certificate attesting either that no portion of the filing was drafted by generative artificial intelligence (such as ChatGPT, Harvey.AI, or Google Bard) or that any language drafted by generative artificial intelligence was checked for accuracy, using print reporters or traditional legal databases, by a human being," according to a new "judge-specific requirement" in Starr's courtroom.

Can a lawyer say why this has any effect at all? Isn't some identified lawyer or firm always officially responsible for everything in a filing?

(I heard of a lawyer filing some LLM lying output, and just assumed that lawyer is getting ripped apart, up to three different ways.)