Hacker News Reader

Comment by coffeebeqn | Hacker News Reader

My first thought was - wait this sounds exactly like Quest Pro but a $1000 cheapwr

Same here.

I tried a Quest Pro for 30 days, but returned for various reasons - too heavy, poor battery time, rigid support, no top strap, no prescription lenses (at the time), etc. I was expecting Quest 3 to come at a much more reasonable price tag, and incorporate similar specs.

Jury still out, but it seems to be the case. Looking forward to testing it.

How can you return a working product that you used for 30 days?

US culture. You can just return stuff for any reason within the return policy of the store. Leads to some people "renting" expensive equipment by buying it then returning it a couple days later after it's been used.

It's also a way for big merchants to crush smaller merchants, especially with music gear. Guitar Center will accept returns where the product can no longer be sold new and eat the cost while a local merchant can't, and loses business as a result.

Plus the quite common experience now of buying "new" only to find that the unit is scuffed and missing parts etc.

It's another one of those things that seems like a win for the consumer but is really just anticompetitive and borderline fraudulent.

It even has a depth sensor that the pro is missing to gave better AR. The only thing that’s missing is face and eye tracking. No one cares about face tracking but foveated rendering is now supported for PCVR and it improved some standalone games too

Reply on news.ycombinator.com