Maryland License Plates Now Inadvertently Advertising Filipino Online Casino
vice.com
vice.com
I got my car in 2012 -- this was the "standard" plate for 2012-2016, that you got whether you wanted it or not (unless you paid for a "specialty plate", an existing program. https://mva.maryland.gov/about-mva/Pages/info/27300/27300-29...)
State MVA puts a URL it does not own or control in any way on a license plate that will last for decades, never even considers that the URL could change hands, is pretty hilarious.
I've hated this license plate for 11 years now -- I don't want to advertise flags and wars on my license plate. I wonder if via this snafu I can get them to replace it with a regular one; there seemed to be no normal way to ask for a standard one to replace this 2012 commemorative one up to now.
> “The MVA does not endorse the views or content on the current website using that URL, and is working with the agency’s IT department to identify options to resolve the current issue.”
The "option," we all know, would be paying now-hostage-level price for buying the domain. I don't know whether I'd rather my tax dollars went to that or replacing the plate of any 2012 plate holder who asks. What I'd really rather is they stop spending any resources on annoying mandated special commemorative license plates. Bring back two-color solid license plates.
The war that is being advertised is the one where the British were a bit frustrated that we didn’t accept their ways, and they were coming back to take what was theirs. They rolled up to DC and burned everything except a few buildings. Legend has it that Madison and family left the White House so fast that when the British arrived, the food was still warm on the table.
The British then rolled up to Baltimore thinking it would be an easy capture just like D.C. was.
They were wrong, and we ended up causing them to pack up and leave in defeat.
The war is prestigious to Maryland because over 3,000 militia members from Maryland, Delaware, and Pennsylvania successfully kept the worlds superpower at bay, saving Baltimore and probably the rest of the country.
It is embarrassing that the British Empire couldn’t achieve a full victory against what was, at the time, a regional power. It is embarrassing that the US couldn’t fend off a sideshow invasion. It is embarrassing the whole thing couldn’t have been sorted out diplomatically.
Nothing was accomplished by the war but a bunch of buildings burning down and some tens of thousands dying. The deserters look pretty good in retrospect.
I've never studied history, and especially have never studied it abroad, but I think I've just always assumed that nations who've lost wars don't generally spend a lot of time educating their students about them.
I'm sure there are exceptions to this - World Wars 1 and 2 seem too big to go missing from literature, for example, and perhaps this is my naive, too-literal interpretation of "history is written by the victors," but I'd just always expect losses to either be minimized, or be taught exclusively to vilify a persistent enemy.
I am absolutely 100% positive that I neither paid extra dollars for the War of 1812 commemorative license plate, nor was offered an option -- this was the "standard" plate in 2012, no other "standard" plate was available, this was what you got unless you wanted to pay for a "specialty" plate.
Perhaps in 2013-2016 it was different. Or perhaps if you already had a standard pre-2012 plate, you could pay to replace it with the commemorative one? But if you were getting new plates in 2012, you got this one as the default option. I am sure.
Other interesting historical facts about the War of 1812 include all the native indian nations who allied with Great Britain in the desperate futile hope that somehow they could stop their inexorable disposession and ethnic cleansing by the USA.
https://web.archive.org/web/20101128031616/http://starspangl...
Anyway, I still don't want to advertise war on my license plate.
But different legal regime under Great Britain -- and different position as colony of a European state vs independent "we're all we've got" -- does seem likely to be relevant, good call.
I suppose the best case for native nations in the War of 1812 would be that both USA and Great Britain get weakened and distracted from further colonization for as long as possible.
No.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Tribal-Nomenclature-America...
"The word Indian came to be used because Christopher Columbus repeatedly expressed the mistaken belief that he had reached the shores of South Asia. "
They had a good idea how far it was from Europe to the east coast of Asia going westwards.
They knew that an ocean going ship wouldn’t have enough provisions to make the journey.
Columbus thought the earth was far smaller and he would be able to make it. He was wrong. Fortunatly for him there was a large landmass in the way which meant he could get restock his provisions (water, food etc)
It doesn't really have clear "winners" or "losers." Really more like Britain getting stung by a bee while it was in the middle of something (War with France) and finding that rather inconvenient, but successfully fending off the bee's (America's) attempt to take its house.
I love mandatory glorification of this on my license plate. Advertising for a casino is just icing on the cake.
True. That is often disregarded in how we talk about nation-state competition.
The UK was actively making concessions to try and avoid war. The United States declared war anyway.
The UK then taking the fight to DC was absolutely fair game. People are allowed to fight back when you attack them.
*impressment is the word they used.
They didn't learn from it, because at the other end of the war, the British regulars were decisively handled by another ragtag group that they didn't think much of.
The country puts their code ("DK", "S" etc) on the left.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_vehicle_registration_...
Our previous, Save The Honeybee: https://scontent-iad3-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.6435-9/138097239_1...
Current, NC Aquariums: https://www.obxtoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/NCA-plat...
Next, Venus Flytrap: https://i.redd.it/v1d1vce3uks31.jpg
Funds from these support the cause on the plate typically.
What percentage, though?
I'm not a resident, but I found this hilarious as well. I think putting any URL on a license plate (or similar) is poor form, actually, but one that you don't actually control and take pains to ensure you keep registered? Hilarious level incompetency right there.
I chuckled a little at this because the Maryland flag is on EVERYTHING in Maryland, including the current standard license plate.
Mine is a Plain white piece of metal, with black letters, no logo, no seals, no anything. White and black
1. Reporting my plate as stolen or damaged (assume there's a replacement fee, don't know how much)
2. Paying $20 and then $10/year forever for a "specialty" plate.
Granted, even though I'm complaining about this like a grumpy old man, I have spent probably 20 minutes on three occasions looking into it by googling. If someone can find a free way (or even reasonable one-time fee) for me to get a standard plate without having to lie about it being stolen or damaged (or getting someone to steal or damage it haha), do point me to the procedure. In general, as expected, doing most anything with the MVA is a really confusing maze of bureaucracy, so I have some conditioned fear of trying it even if there is a procedure (but I haven't found one).
I am now wondering what, say, Jehovah's Witnesses did, I bet they and/or other religious groups would not be okay with a flag on their car for religious reasons.
I’m pretty sure I didn’t have exclusive rights in to badly tightened bolts.
This was in CA, but there was no police report or anything. I imagine plates fly off cars with some routine each year all over the country.
Contact your DMV and look up what’s involved with replacing a lost plate. At most they’ll likely want the matching pair (I assume they come in pairs in MD) back and a small fee.
Relatively cheap compared to many other states.
But I imagined the whole reason they have "specialty" plates is revenue generation?
https://mva.maryland.gov/about-mva/Pages/info/27300/27300-29...
I think "specialty" plates are silly. I am old enough to remember when there was one option, and for every state it was white letters on a different solid color background, and that was fine.
If my level of bother for the website would have been higher than my appetite for legal risk I'd be checking the statutes and covering it with a proper paint job that does not damage the actual plate info
The phrases show poor empathy on your part: It's a hassle to go to the RMV and get another plate, it's a hassle to update any place where your plate needs to be registered, it costs money...
But you can choose from many different suppliers.
Here in the US, you have to get them from the DMV, but the legibility requirements are so low. The backgrounds, narrow font, and minimal reflectivity all make them much worse than those in the UK and Europe.
(Lack of enforcement is also a problem: I lived in the UK for ~10x the time I've lived in the US, but in the US I've seen ~10x as many cars with missing numberplates.
Those aren't legal, although you can probably get away with them for a while.
Certainly human history is full of war and violence, and that is what has led to where we are, sure. That doesn't mean we need to glorify it. Or that the state has to impose the glorification of it on car identification plates.
What's with the proto-fascism on HN these days? Scary times.
Sent from my iPhone, unfortunately built using slave labor in the supply chain. I could use an android but it probably does the same or worse. To others who are equally complicit whenever they use a computer. Should I remove the apple sticker I placed on my car?
Where there is the problem. Maryland sub-contracted out the site, probably stopped paying for it or the "contractor" closed done. Someone grabbed it.
Well I hope Maryland is enjoying what may be mo more than 10 cents per year per plate they are saved in taxing people. And as a bonus, they also are now giving out free advertising.
Next step, force people to replace the plates and maybe charge them a fee for doing that.
Their options are Jack & Shit, and Jack already left town. You think this gambling site is going to voluntarily give back the domain for pittance that this state agency could afford to offer it? You think a DMV of a state is going to come up with the funds for a highly publicized domain squabble? The public blowback from that should be intense. The agency's IT department has already shown their incompetence and lack of funding by not being able to pay the registration fees for a domain long enough for something they used on an official state "document".
The whole thing reeks of incompetence or even some sort of corruption
maybe slightly higher since you can get your phone to automatically picture-to-text recognize it instead of having to type it in yourself, but... probably still pretty minimal.
I mean, I'm most shocked that anyone noticed the url's contents have changed! I wonder how long it took anyone to.
So it's taken over half a year before the media to notice.
To fix this, the state of Maryland should identify everybody who still has this license plate and send them a replacement plate in the current style. They have that information in a database somewhere, associated with names and addresses, so they should be able to run a simple query. If not, that means they probably need to fund a project to upgrade their databases to a modern implementation of SQL.
Florida has "myflorida.com" which is an official government website, but .com is not a limited and controlled TLD; so in theory registration could fail and someone scoop it up.
If it were "myflorida.gov" that would be much less likely.
ahahahah http://myflorida.gov redirects to dot com (it's dot muffin)!
The plan would have been to change this later to read md.gov/starspangled200, which will 301 redirect to maryland.gov/starspangled200, which needs to be made to point to a new starspangled200.maryland.gov subdomain because the Windows server running www.maryland.gov requires everything to be under the www.maryland.gov/Pages/<page name>.aspx URL scheme... But project management ran over budget, and the people who needed to be contacted about those changes couldn't be reached, and when the subcontractor's project manager talked to the vendor's project manager who emailed the wrong government IT department, some information was lost. The necessary forms needed to be filed, but to do so the contractor needed a particular vendor ID number and approval for that takes months, how many more projects do you plan to do for the state? And anyways starspangled200.com looks pretty clean, do we really want to do this optional redirect? So they spent some pocket change and registered it for 10 years, and handed off the task of renewing it to some administrator who could spell DNS but knew nothing else about it with a stern warning that things would break if it was not renewed.
Disclaimer: I have no specific knowledge of this project.
Most government entities are not qualified for .edu.
For a while (pretty long ago, I think early 00s, maybe even late 90s) GSA (who managed .gov. at the time) made some noises about narrowing it further (may have even closed noncompliant registration for a while, while keeping grandfathered ones) to federal government sites only, which led to a lots states using .com or .<state>.us domains for nongrandfathered domains, and even adopting them as preferred sites where they had grandfathered domains.
The policy direction died fairly quickly, but the impacts were more lasting.
California offers a special plate for UCLA but it has no URL.
I know whitehouse.gov uses lets encrypt; I wonder how many TLDs have domains using them, and which the rarest is.
https://www.lovelafayette.org/city-hall/city-departments/pol...
A direct gmail domain is understandable for a small city government but it does look unprofessional. I liked how governments were one of the few organizations that took advantage of the hierarchical nature of dns, you would get things like dmv.ca.gov and courts.sf.ca.gov Unfortunately that is going away as well. everybody has to have a second level domain and now you have stupid things like lovelafayette.org instead of lafayette.ca.gov
Anyway, I figure that's what happened here from 2012 to 2022.
https://www.iana.org/domains/root/servers University of Maryland
Maybe the H server too.
In a database, which, for dot-org, would be owned by Public Interest Registry, which is headquartered in Reston, Virginia, US:
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_Interest_Registry
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.org
Though the technical side of things is run by Afilias / Identity Digital, located in Bellevue, WA:
It's registered at godaddy currently, if they were smart they'd transfer the domain to an unfriendly and very non-nato country quickly if this bubbles over somewhere officially. I'd probably have opted to just redirect to a random fetish porn site for grins, but if you have a gambling empire and stand to profit why not, you already have free marketing for life courtesy of the Maryland government.
This is hilarious and inevitable.
> This is hilarious and inevitable.
Hilarious, yes, but only inevitable because of widespread incompetence. Whenever I get a little Impostor Syndrome and question my own competence at my own job, it feels good to read these kinds of articles to reassure myself that there are people out there orders of magnitude less competent.
In the UK you just take your vehicle registration document to any motor accessories shop and have them make up a plate, for not much money.
I thought the US courts believe .com and .org to be 'in' the US and have seized gambling .com domains that are targeting US citizens in the past.
If anything it was a draw and I say that as a Canadian. The USA were the aggressors and never got anything so really it was a loss for the US.
Fort McHenry is in the lower left of the license plate.
The star spangled banner flies above it.
The "bombs bursting in air" are the fireworks.
It doesn't commemorate the war, it commemorates the anthem, it just says "War of 1812" because that's when the event occurred.
It was a terrible design but I've got amateur radio plates so I avoided it.
Maybe they should learn that they did actually endorse it, and they should be liable for it.
Imagine if the NBA put that same link on their jerseys, and then a white supremacist organization bought out the URL. Would they be liable for “endorsing” it? Of course they would! Same for Maryland. Morons.
That's the very TL;DR version made hazy by the passage of time. Apologies for no doubt missing any number of salient points.