The privacy implications are a bit worrisome. Perhaps it's time to write utilities to anonymize your writing style.
Maybe running your text through a round-trip translator could help? (although then you'd need to fix any errors introduced).
Maybe running your text through a round-trip translator could help? (although then you'd need to fix any errors introduced).
If your writing is too identifying, just perturb the text until the tool fails to identify the author. Or even better: perturb the writing until the deanonymizer fingers someone else, in a usefully confounding way.
The deanonymizer's feature-extraction/analysis could itself help drive the perturbation routines. "Make my word choice more like Paul Graham", you could say. And even if there are limits to its automatic substitutions, it could offer coaching: "To make your writing more Graham-like, decrease your average sentence length and use fewer interjections."
Edit, resubmit, repeat until the right author is fingered.
Business idea: website that offers this tuning to help un-deanonymize or faux-deanonymize writing.
Evil business idea: this website remembers everything submitted, to allow the super-deep-pocketed to peek in and de-un-deanonymize (of re-deanonymize?) blocks of text.