Try out Bard, it's coding is much improved in the last 2 weeks. I've unfortunately switched over for the time being.
Can you please help me with how you are prompting it?
It'll take you much farther, by allowing you to incrementally solve your problem in smaller steps while giving the model the proper context required for each step of the problem-solving process, and limiting the things it must consider for each branch of your problem.
Examples:
My testing agrees with yours. Almost seems like a sponsored marketing campaign with no truth to it.
On the first day, it felt like 80% of the responses were in the first (fail/hallucinate) category, but over time it feels more like a 50/50 split, which makes it worth running prompts over both ChatGPT and Bard and select the best one. I don't know if the change is because I learnt to prompt it better, or if they improved the models based on all the user chats from the public release - perhaps both.
"write me a script in python3 that uses selenium to log into a MyBB forum"
note: usually it will not compile and you still have to do some editing
The Swiss version of GDPR is coming in September:
https://www.ey.com/en_ch/law/a-new-era-for-data-protection-i...
If Google gobble up data about EU citizens then they fall under GDPR.
It doesn't matter that they don't allow EU citizens to use the result.
If our personal data is in there and they are don't protect it properly they are violating EU law. And protecting it properly means from everyone, not just EU citizens.
Choice of law is anything but simple. Think of geographic scoping of laws as a rough rule of thumb sovereign states use to avoid annoying each other, rather than as a law of nature.
Anything Google does with data of EU residents is subject to GDPR even if that particular service is not offered within EU, and it is definitely enforceable because Google has a presence in EU, which can be (and has been) subjected to fines, seizures of assets, etc.
Making it unavailable in the EU decreases the likelihood and severity of a potential fine.
[1] - https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/data-protection-and-the...
https://console.cloud.google.com/vertex-ai/generative/langua...
Also do you need to change the options like Token Limit etc?
Ideally one would want to be able to have a cap on the amount that can be spent in a given period.
Thanks for this! I had a temporary Cap One card on my cloud accounts. I’m going to switch them to Privacy.com ones to limit amount if I can’t find another solution.
Alpaca is pretty good though.
They have no leadership at the top. Nobody that can steer the ship to the next land (or even anybody that has a map). Who is actively working at Alphabet that has the authority to kill Google search through self-cannibalization? Absolutely nobody. They're screwed accordingly. It takes an enormous level of authority (think: Steve Jobs) and leadership to even considering intentionally putting at risk a $200 billion sales product. The trick of course is that it's already at great risk.
They don't know what to do, so they're particularly reactive. It has been that way for a long time though, it's just that Google search was never under serious threat previously, so it didn't really matter as a terminal risk if they failed (eg with their social network efforts; their social networks were reactive).
It's somewhat similar to watching Microsoft under Ballmer and how they lacked direction, didn't know what to do, and were too reactive. You can tell when a giant entity like Google is wandering aimlessly.
For now. It's just a marketing tool/demo site, like ITA Matrix was/is. The ads are vended by Bing.
Don't you worry, if there is any medium, place or mode of interaction people spend time on, advertising will eventually metastasize to it, and will keep growing until it completely devalues the activity and destroys most of the utility it provides.