Amazon is discontinuing Alexa’s celebrity voices, even if you paid for them
theverge.com
theverge.com
"Last November, a report from The Wall Street Journal revealed that Amazon CEO Andy Jassy heavily scrutinized the company’s Alexa sector, as its operating losses exceeded $5 million in recent years."
"The company also announced layoffs affecting 18,000 employees earlier this year, with Amazon hardware chief Dave Limp telling CNBC that 2,000 of those cuts affected workers in his division, which is in charge of Alexa and Echo products."
It turns out that the "killer app" for Alexa / Echo devices is being a voice-activated kitchen timer and playing music. Some users also use it as a voice-activated controller for smart home devices, but they are only a small fraction of users. This means that Alexa costs more to operate than it brings in in revenue, so they are looking to cut costs in any way they can.
Hooking up ChatGPT or similarly powered backend seems like a next step to stay competitive, but that will cost even more to operate. Expect to see a smarter AI-powered Alexa available for a subscription that gives better answers and has more skills.
I’ve also noticed they aren’t selling that microwave anymore.
Umm, no. If I owned these devices (which I don't, because it's spyware), I'd push for the ability to plug in my model of choice (e.g., Alexa, ChatGPT, BARD, my own model).
Because Alexa lives in the Cloud, this should not impact the hardware I don't believe. Firmware updates can happen regardless of my voice-assistant of choice.
Smaller models can be stored locally on device, or accessible via a skill. Larger models can be stored in the cloud, just like Alexa. However, I don't think that a personal voice assistant language model requires cloud. Unless of course Amazon removed the on-device memory. If they did, then that decision essentially rendered 100 million devices e-waste, as they are surveillance bricks without the "subscription service" Amazon will require owners to purchase.
Yikes, what a mess.
The Home Assistant team really seems like they are going to accomplish their goal of fully local voice assistants this year, but are avoiding any discussion of training or using any model that isn't fully licensed and open sourced. Piper seems nice, but there are dozens of other voices I would like instead, including my own voice.
So maybe with enough demand, there will be a similar voice solution.
This sort of exposes how very little I understand of this technology. Maybe I can Cunningham my way into learning something new very affordably here.