I am worried and thus want to be proven wrong. However, I've yet to hear a good argument as to why it would unfold differently. Why do you think we will be able to collaborate and achieve UBI or something like that, why would those at the top care for those below them, or rather why would the AGI care about us unless we achieve alignment which is said to take at least another 50 years, also we're assuming that everyone has the best interests of humanity in mind. How can you prevent other countries trying to do catch up from developing their own AI's that have no limits set on them? I want to be wrong, but I am worried that things will go off in the wrong direction. Also AI is being trained on human data, it would be awkward if it were to behave differently or come to a different kind of solutions than we do. And lastly:

>Humans are the APEX predator of earth right now and if something else takes over that, then thats just evolution and nature.

I guess, if it's inevitable we might as well just give up on trying to change things. But is it?