It feels like this article is portraying women as creatures bound to their nature and men as unchanging monoliths.
And people seek young partners with large breasts. That's not a behavior specific to men. How many men do you know that look for a woman with money?
Indeed the whole article fails to identify gender roles and cultural norms as the source.
It also uses the term "market value" as something natural and inevitable. There's a lot of hidden bias here.
you can't look at electrons without some sort of bias; such is the nature of all research.
however "data is biased", and the implied "statistics are racist / classist / sexist" etc., is most often used by those who don't want to see what the data lays out, and have no other way to discredit it.