The idea of introducing bugs to users that doesn’t conform 100% to intended use of your software is not good idea, what will happen is that your software will be perceived as buggy in general.
Not your software, a competitor's software. The intent here was to inject bugs to make DRDOS look bad. And it worked.
Later Microsoft would have to spend many long years dealing with how many extension points they'd put in Windows which were opportunities for third parties to inject crashes accidentally into Microsoft executables. That's why there's an entire subsystem to allow video drivers to crash and restart.
While it's immoral, it doesn't seem to produce the result that you hope it's be producing.
Which was the entire point and intention, as we saw in an email chain that came out during court.
The mechanism with organizations works like you said yes. They'll just develop processes to work around the bugs until it becomes completely impossible.