I don't like wearing (and don't wear) watches or any kind of bands/rings/etc at all - they feel like a constant weight and then there's sweat, and pressure, and all that.
My oura ring has been far more helpful in identifying patterns leading to less quality sleep. For example , by highlighting elevated resting heart rates and asking me if I ate later that night, consumed spicy foods or alcohol, etc. That said, it’s not terribly durable. After a couple years it refused to accept firmware updates. Then a few weeks ago (after maybe 3 years of use) it stopped connecting to the app altogether and support tickets are going unanswered. This is greatly disappointing but I may spring for a replacement anyway because of how helpful it’s been in correlating lifestyle choices to sleep parameters (& quite consistently so).
Can you cite a medical study that evaluates the accuracy of your smart watch’s assessment of your quality of sleep?
Preferably one not sponsored by the manufacturer?
Seems to accurately analyze them. Conclusion "Device sleep stage assessments were inconsistent."
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8120339/
This research was funded by the Office of Naval Research, Code 34. (see also Disclosure Statement)
Great news.
Also, is there a more "layman readable" version of this paper/report?
>Oura ring was 96% accurate in detecting sleep compared to polysomnography, 48% accurate in detecting wakefulness, 65% agreement in detecting “light sleep,” 51% agreement in detecting “deep sleep” and 61% agreement in detecting REM
So it's basically wrong with sleep categorization about half the time.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8120339/
Most devices (Fatigue Science Readiband, Fitbit Alta HR, EarlySense Live, ResMed S+, SleepScore Max) performed as well as or better than actigraphy on sleep/wake performance measures, while the Garmin devices performed worse.
this sounds like i'm screwed...