The Demon Core and the Strange Death of Louis Slotin (2016)
newyorker.com
newyorker.com
There's something uniquely terrifying about a substance that is safe to handle in one orientation, but utterly deadly in another.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6ZIjbX1gj88
As bizarre as it is, Karameru's weird shorts probably brought a lot of attention to the Demon Core seeing as they're rather popular (even just that one is currently at 4.1M views.)
I'd wager this is the weirdest thing I've ever found an excuse to link to on HN.
[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokaimura_nuclear_accidents
It can indeed: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cecil_Kelley_criticality_accid...
In addition to the aspect of its horror that you highlighted, radiation is also a go-to science bogeyman because how how cause and effect are perceptually disjoint. You can feel absolutely fine absorbing way past an LD50 of radiation at the moment it happens; the suffering comes later, from hours to days later. Like firing up a computer with an already-damaged hard drive, you won't have a problem until the OS needs that data and loads garbage instead of useful routines.
Ingesting or inhaling any of that oxide would result in a slow and very painful death.
That wasn't something quite as dangerous as the demon core, but a fake "orphan source".
What are they doing? Besides being obviously stupid, how is anything useful coming out of that? It doesn't look like anybody is actually measuring anything useful.
He's randomly wiggling that screwdriver back and forth, but what for? Is somebody collecting data for a table or a graph? Shouldn't the separation distance, or angle, or something being carefully measured and controlled?
As I understand it, Slotin was demonstrating to another colleague how to test the distance dependence of criticality, so the data collected was less valuable to the demonstration than the procedure. I think the creative license here was the second screw driver to make it look more sciencey. Holding one half of the beryllium sphere with a bare hand (as was part of the approved procedure) probably felt a little too slap-dash, and the fact that Slotin's procedure involving a screw-driver was unapproved in the first place undermines the role of the scene to call out the government's lack of care for Cusack's American-everyman character. If there's a (tenuous) moral to be extracted from the incident, its that Slotin apparently believed in the cowboy persona he projected, and it cost him his life.
And yes, all they had were the counters.
Other than that, the video is really inaccurate.
So what's the point, simply to practically demonstrate that less distance = more radiation? I guess that makes some sense, but it seems too trivial of a thing to demonstrate to people in a high level, secret operation.
I'm just imagining that for this to actually produce some sort of useful result there needs to be some sort of precise measuring happening. Maybe moving half the sphere with a screw and having a dial indicator there, or something.
"Nine days after the accident, Slotin died after “a total disintegration of bodily functions.” Ironically, he had become disillusioned with the postwar atomic tests, and one reason for that ill-fated experiment was to train a replacement, so Slotin could resume his prewar research in biophysics and radiobiology at the University of Chicago. He never got that chance.
In response to his death, Los Alamos ceased all hands-on experiments with critical assemblies, using remote controlled machines to protect the operators. As for the killer “demon core,” it was used in one of the first postwar atomic bomb tests at Bikini Atoll, a mere five weeks after Slotin’s death. The test went off without a hitch."
https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/201405/physicshisto...
If the actual experiment needs precisely sized shims, then any demo should be done with shims. Because you'd want to show people what shims, how they're placed, and what's supposed to happen.
I thought it was a high-energy pulse over a few milli- or even nanoseconds, stopped by thermal expansion of the core or reflectors. Oscillation between supercriticality and subcriticality seems possible, but that would probably also look different.
Criticality isn't the same thing as a deliberate nuclear detonation.
Since the time scale of the exponential term in the equation for prompt criticality is on the order of nanoseconds, any sustained (i.e. non-oscillating/somehow naturally moderated) event, in a configuration as simple as a few geometric neutron reflectors, would either be over after less than a few of these, or leave a crater, and what was pictured in the clip seems sustained to me.
Witnesses reported blue light, so hollywood did blue light. It's a movie not a documentary.
Regardless we know from the witnesses in the room the criticality at least lasted long enough for Louis to need to use his hand to separate the cores, which is clearly not nanosecond scale, so I'm not sure what exactly you're expecting or criticizing here. The only difference I can find googling is that he apparently used one hand one screwdriver, not two.
The Demon Core and the Strange Death of Louis Slotin - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25317021 - Dec 2020 (1 comment)
Demon Core: The Strange Death of Louis Slotin (2016) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20744425 - Aug 2019 (22 comments)
Demon Core: The Strange Death of Physicist Louis Slotin - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11749742 - May 2016 (34 comments)
"Under Slotin's own unapproved protocol, the shims were not used and the only thing preventing the closure was the blade of a standard flat-tipped screwdriver manipulated in Slotin's other hand. Slotin, who was given to bravado, became the local expert, performing the test on almost a dozen occasions, often in his trademark blue jeans and cowboy boots, in front of a roomful of observers."
play stupid games, win stupid prizes. his only salvation was that he sacrificed himself to save his colleagues.
there were also other, safer ways to do it
"Enrico Fermi reportedly told Slotin and others they would be "dead within a year" if they continued performing the test in that manner."
At some point, I got in a conversation about what would happen if you drank nothing but heavy water. The short answer is that yes, this would kill you; the differing molecular weight between molecules built with heavy hydrogen and regular hydrogen will eventually add up to disruption of metabolic processes in ways that we haven't even researched. But we haven't researched them because it would cost an absolute fortune to get enough of the stuff to do yourself in.
This would be a suicide reserved for billionaires.
Its toxicity profile is kind of interesting. In almost all eukaryotes (plants, animals, fungi) low concentrations (1 - 10%) seem to have no obvious effect at all, while around 25% it seems to cause temporary sterility - the gametes seem particularly sensitive. As it approaches 50%, cell reproduction stops and death is rapid. Very few eukaryotes can survive >50% heavy water in their cells. Though a few types of yeast and single-celled plants seem to be able to survive in conditions like many bacteria can - up to 95% or more heavy water. But all kinds of life die at 100% heavy water, as far as I know.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heavy_water#Effect_on_biologic...
That's part of why thermonuclear weapons have such a disturbingly high "bang for the buck." The enriched uranium or plutonium primary is really expensive. So is the rocket that gets it where it's going. But the lithium deuteride that makes up the fusion fuel is comparatively dirt cheap.
No idea what the cost of enriched U, Pu, or lithium deuteride is, but I'll note that A) current day thermonuclear warheads deliver an estimated 50% of the total output through fission of enriched U (casing) and Pu (primary) B) the lithium in lithium deuteride, as well as the deuterium, need to be enriched, so probably not quite dirt cheap (depends on your definition of dirt cheap I guess)?
I'd put in the same category as falling from a great height.
Prior to humans enriching radioactive materials, how many humans died from ARS vs. falling from a great height?
Yeah, onto the surface of the sun.
There are famous engineering incidents that are good to study -- the Challenger disaster, the Minnesota Bridge collapse, the Therac 25... But compared with the LANL Criticality incident, there's something different. The former are all technical failure analysis.
This incident is almost existential in it's implications, like Shelly's Frankenstein. A discussion on the nature of humanity.
what remains to look back may proclaim these times as the birth of their universe ;)