Hacker News Reader

I would be inherently suspicious of videos. They are poor ways to engage critically with something. They can engage in exaggeration, misrepresentation, and outright lies, and you can't easily check them.

It would be so much more believable to just provide a link to the publisher or Amazon. But it's so easy to make a video and have people repeat the accusation.

You can’t link to part of a book.

The alternative though is pornhub. I see a study from 2017

"Study on Australians ages 15-29 found that 100% of the men (82% of women) had viewed porn."

No shocker there but:

"Also, 69 percent of males and 23 percent of females first viewed porn at age 13 or younger."

Just one of those things that makes me love being child free. No clue what you do in this situation.

Age inappropriate instructional materials don’t serve as a shield against harm from pornography.

Is there any research that increasing the level of explicitness and detail for younger ages increases benefit or mitigates harm?

I don't think a book can be rated NC-17.

proof.