> > that's masochistic! ... I honestly doubt that these make your life easier.
> 100% of the functionality without hand movement.
Yeah, this is the key point.
These keyboards ultimately trade-off "benefit of reduced hand movement, at the expense of a more complex layout".
A standard keyboard has some bad design flaws that these keyboards fix: the spacebar is impractically large, asymmetric row-stagger is bad. -- On a standard keyboard, you'll end up using your (weak) pinky fingers much more than your (strong) thumb. Ideally, it would be the other way around!
With these keyboards, the thumbs get to reach 2-3 keys each. This allows bringing all the keys on a standard keyboard to within reach of the hand, without having to move the hands.
e.g. Without having to move my hands, my thumbs can press space, esc, tab, backspace, and enter.
With 'tap-hold functionality' (key acts as normal when tapped, acts as a different key when held), I can put Shift/Ctrl/Gui/Alt underneath asdf (and mirrored on the right hand side), so that I can use the modifiers without having to use my pinkies as much. -- And the other complexity is putting all the other keys (like numbers and symbols) on layers.
Overall, I think it's the same power-user trade-off as vim/emacs make: more complex to use, but allows for more concise usage.