Skinner: Well, I was wrong; the lizards are a godsend.
Lisa: But isn't that a bit short-sighted? What happens when we're overrun by lizards?
Skinner: No problem. We simply release wave after wave of Chinese needle snakes. They'll wipe out the lizards.
Lisa: But aren't the snakes even worse?
Skinner: Yes, but we're prepared for that. We've lined up a fabulous type of gorilla that thrives on snake meat.
Lisa: But then we're stuck with gorillas!
Skinner: No, that's the beautiful part. When wintertime rolls around, the gorillas simply freeze to death.
Is it just a case of the scale making it safe?
0: https://www.timeout.com/croatia/things-to-do/ston-salt-works
The brine slowly go down through geological layers. After 5 years it reaches groundwater reservoir.
20-50 years later, the regions become famous for its fun pod racing and for its numerous ghost cities around the old plain.
The problem is strictly local: if the brine produced by the plant is dumped in an area with low flow, it can hang around and affect sea life.
If you use a big discharge pipe and put it a decent distance offshore in a current where it can mix effectively, there’s very little effect.
This is not a reason to shoot down desalination plants as a concept, it’s a design constraint to take into account when building them.
of course, a renewable powered ship
If you have ever flown into SFO you have seen the reddish pools. (By the way the red color comes from Brine Shrimp, which presumably there is also use for)
https://www.atlasobscura.com/places/salt-ponds-san-francisco
https://www.archdaily.com/994769/could-salt-be-a-material-of...
When you have a practically free resource which is waste from a large scale industrial process, cottage industries to make use of the free waste sometimes pop up. It's a solvable problem.
You’re actually right. We’ll probably burn garbage and radio hosts will call people against burning garbage effeminate names.
As you can set it up to burn very hot and have all sorts of scrubbers on the outcomes.
We are scrambling to find ways to capture atmospheric carbon and store it underground and burning garbage is literally the opposite of that.
You'd have to do the math, it's not manifestly obvious that it's not the case (especially once you consider all the transportation involved in sending waste around the country and across the ocean).
Maybe people prefer incinerators in their community over landfills in their community (unclear), but if that's the case, that's a policy decision and not one that seeks to minimize carbon emissions.
It's likely that landfill are the way to go in many cases, but people don't like them.
The same designer made this Terracooler which is also a fascinating idea.
We also, so far, globally have not shown any evidence of replacing fossil fuels with green energy, only supplementing them.
And we need more power to let emerging economies rise out of poverty, where having electric pumps and washing are truely life-changing from a quality of life perspective.
So we need about 5x more total energy while also shifting from 80% fossil to 0% fossil.
This is why I advocate for nuclear while most people advocate for wind and solar. We need advocates for all clean energy. Nuclear can actually use its own direct low-carbon heat to help with buildings (district heat) and industry, and that heat can also help in desal in some cases, though RO is the preference these days and doesn't really need that much heat input.