Not to be the one prone to whataboutism, but why is the one blatantly unsubstantive pro-crypto comment chided while several other equally blatantly unsubstantive anti-crypto comments never receive the same treatment?
https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&qu...
Here are lots of past explanations if anyone wants to read more:
https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...
https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...
"Please don't fulminate. Please don't sneer, including at the rest of the community."
Saying it's unsubstantive is nicer.
It was a substantive comment. It made a statement of fact that contradicted the articles title.
That allowed someone to reply with another substantive fact "Bitcoin addresses hasn't grown for 2 years" with link
Which I would not agree is exactly a correct summary of the data, but it's worth looking at and has create a thread far better than most of the others - https://studio.glassnode.com/metrics?a=BTC&m=addresses.Activ...