Hacker News Reader

this is one thing makes me think those claiming "it isn't AI" are just caught up in cognizant dissonance. For llm's to function, we have to basically make it reason out, in steps the way we learned to do in school, literally make it think, or use inner monologue, etc.

View on HN

It is funny. Lots of criticisms amount to “this AI sucks because it’s making mistakes and bullshitting like a person would instead of acting like a piece of software that always returns the right answer.”

Well, duh. We’re trying to build a human like mind, not a calculator.

Not without emotions and chemical reactions. You are building a word predictor

What is the difference between a word predictor and a word selector?

Have not humans been demonstrated, time and time again, to be always anticipating the next phrase in a passage of music, or the next word in a sentence?

This is not at all how it works. There is no inner monologue or thought process or thinking happening. It is just really good at guessing the next word or number or output. It is essentially brute forcing.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com