Microsoft will upgrade Windows 10 21H2 users whether they like it or not
theregister.com
theregister.com
I've started mentally filtering the theregister.com links I see on here, because they often seem to be this way.
Forcing a security patch vs forcing an update to Windows 11 is massively different.
I agree on theregister links, it feels like every time I see an article from them its intentionally misleading.
Edit:
What really makes it seem like a clickbait headline is the "wether they like it or not" which heavily implies this will be a negative update to Windows 11 (or some other unwanted change) not a security fix.
Used Windows 10 for a while, mostly for gaming, while for development work I relied on WSL. While I think Windows is okay, I sort of dreaded the move to Windows 11.
So I tried moving to Linux and honestly, I couldn't have done better. Things like Proton and WINE are being excellent for running games and Windows applications. I can't find a single reason to switch back now. I've been at this for a couple of months and not once I thought "oh crap, I need Windows for that".
If anyone is in the same situation I used to be, holding onto Windows for being able to play their game Library, give it a try. With minor tinkering everything works like a charm.
Probably the only thing I run Windows for (and that's a VM on Linux) is to run HP's Document Scanner software for my HP 426 MFP. I keep hoping great things for Wine and Reactos but, for the moment at least, I'll have to keep on relying on Windows 7 on VirtualBox for my scanning.
[1] https://developers.hp.com/hp-linux-imaging-and-printing/supp...
Not that I'm a fan of forced updates, I just find it odd how different users have different preferences, yet users who want control over their computer continue to buy products from authoritarian companies.
I cannot figure out how to permanently uninstall M$ edge...
I'm pushing my company to switch to Linux. Microsoft finally has done it.
The point being, I appreciate having computers around that do what I tell them, instead of having to do what the computer tells me.
I almost think the home version of windows is actually a reduced version of windows. You need at least the pro version to get the normal experience you expect to get from a paid software (while apple don't do that to mac users)
I’m not worried about a nation state going after my Steam credentials, so any updates they’ve pushed in the last couple years are likely just going to annoy me by changing the UI in some way like adding a 6th or 7th control panel for sound settings, with the real one being hidden deeper into their fever dream of a menu structure.
Fortunately it's an easy way to pick which games are worth my time.
Even if you aren't using arch this compatibility list can be a big sign of how your hardware will do; https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Lenovo_ThinkPad_X1_Carbon_(...
I don't have a Lenovo, I have a Dell, but while tinkering to get the fingerprint reader on my machine working, I had come across this (and I understand it works for Lenovo).
Sure, you might need some new drivers for USB+1 or a GPU, but for machines that run the same hardware there really isn't a reason that something like a XHCI driver shouldn't be able to work on every single version of windows since 2000 if MS cared enough (and linux is even more shameful).
Frankly OS vendors have gotten away with murder for far to long, and if we are going to start mandating lifecycles then the OS vendors shouldn't be the limiting factor (AKA 20+ year OS lifecycles should be mandatory) rather HW efficiency perf or just plain failure rates should be the limiting factor.
AKA Your an OS vendor and there is a security bug, your on the hook for fixing it until every single piece of HW it was sold with has reached its useful end of life. Telling people oh you have to upgrade to the version that requires 10x the system resource to run a sprinkler system (or whatever) and requires a new PC is good for business selling HW but bad for literally every other person on the planet.
Which is to say this clickbaity article is about updating Windows 10 21H2 to Windows 10 22H2. Your rant might be relevant in a thread concerning upgrades to Windows 11.
Like a time machine, it's back to 15 years ago when I used to upgrade my computer every two years.
In the old days of Wintel game, this is when the update will consume so much of your computer resource that you have no choice but upgrade the hardware then restart the cycle of new computer new windows OS, every a few years. It stopped around 10 years ago after Apple woke everybody up. I'm still using my iphone X from 5 years ago and on the latest iOS upgrade, compared to my kids iphone 14 I don't find anything terrible at all on iphone X. Windows has since dropped the "Wintel" model and follow Apple's steps, well, until now.
When I was forced to update to Windows 10 21H2, the update failed to install for half a year, until for unclear reasons, it succeeded.
In the meantime, I had to sit through the installations, boot failures, and rollbacks dozens of times.
it came back a few days later, but I found what did that and deleted that too
hasn't come back now
What’s new in 22H2? Basically nothing is new in 22H2. So if you’re installing updates anyway, nothing changes when you upgrade to 22H2.
Microsoft has gotten obsessive about their need for you to send them your login information for your local install.
Win 10 21H2 to Win 10 22H2 wasn't a very dramatic change for my gaming/etc machine.
Microsoft's work on Windows appears a bit random but they seem to have a working failsafe at the executive group (or board or billg?) level. At least eventually.
Either update to latest or move to Windows 11 or Linux.